Search for: "In Re Harbour"
Results 21 - 40
of 291
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2022, 4:08 am
The U.S. is still “a way away” from any possible decision on whether to re-introduce U.S. troops into Ukraine, Milley said yesterday. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 6:01 am
” While Canadian Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez has agreed to re-assess the online harms policy with a new expert panel and initiated a re-branding as “online safety”, the entire consultation process is an absolute embarrassment to the government. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 12:00 am
” Hidden Harbour Estates, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 12:00 am
” Hidden Harbour Estates, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 6:06 pm
Cabinet had the power to do what was necessary as may by reason of the existence of real or apprehended war, invasion or insurrection deem necessary or advisable for the security, defence, peace, order and welfare of Canada; and for greater certainty, but not so as to restrict the generality of the foregoing terms, it is hereby declared that the powers of the Governor in Council shall extend to all matters coming within the classes of subjects hereinafter enumerated, that is to say:- (a) censorship… [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 12:02 pm
We're all in this together, etc., etc. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 6:59 am
With recent case law from the US indicating that re-use of a branded product, even where rights are exhausted, can result in infringement proceedings, it was concluded that upcycling is unlikely to ever be straightforward. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
La défense suggère au tribunal d’absoudre conditionnellement l’accusé, alors que la poursuite suggère une peine d’emprisonnement de 90 jours, suivie d’une probation assortie de conditions. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 3:45 am
If you fire them you’re a Nazi! [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 3:52 am
"] In re Advanced Nutritional Supplements, Serial No. 88766676 (August 13, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Jonathan Hudis). [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 8:00 am
• TuneIn was also found liable for infringement by authorisation and as a joint tortfeasor and could not rely on the safe harbour defences under Arts 12, 13 and 14 of the E-Commerce Directive.TuneIn Appeal the case and all the EU law of Communication to the Public... [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 4:00 am
An internet truism is that if you’re not paying for the product, you are the product. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 9:01 am
If you’re still having trouble placing it, it’s about 24 miles northwest of Humpty Doo, if that helps. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 6:27 am
" You're right about "lith," but "monolith" is used figuratively to mean "Resembling a monolith; massive; immovable; solidly uniform. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 7:08 am
There is a safe-harbour from authorisation where a “securitisation special purpose entity” meets certain conditions. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 4:21 pm
The Court issued an injunction restraining the United States government from any continuing or future retaliation by which Cohen could be re-confined to prison custody. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 6:34 am
”); Harbour House Props., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 6:59 am
Article 17 enacts a sui generis version of the communication to the public right and a corresponding customised liability safe harbour that will, for platforms within Article 17, replace the general Article 14 ECD shield. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 3:05 am
In this regard, it is also worth noting that, unlike both Article 17 (which excludes the availability of hosting safe harbour in relation to situation covered by that provision) and what the referring court appears to think by looking at how the referred questions have been phrased, the AG considers that the hosting safe harbour is available irrespective of the type of liability at hand.All in allIn conclusion, when it comes to UUC platforms, the AG considers that liability… [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
The original adequacy agreement in relation to the United States (safe harbour) was struck down in Schrems I because it failed to ensure that there was adequate protection on a number of grounds, some of which related to the safe harbour system itself, but some of which related to the law in the US, specifically that which allowed mass surveillance. [read post]
