Search for: "In Re Harm's Appeal" Results 41 - 60 of 5,734
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2009, 10:55 pm
N is a young boy who has two parents who love him but who have demonstrated an unwillingness or inability to put his needs first and who as a result of their relentless pursuit of their own agendas have caused him emotional harm and arguably that emotional harm is significant. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 5:29 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The trial court dismissed Tagle's case because she did not prove negligence.The Court of Appeals (Leval, Sack and Raggi) reverses. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:34 pm by David M. Fry
In re Cyclobenzaprine Hydrochloride Extended-Release Capsule Patent Litigation, 09-MD-2118-SLR (D. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 7:43 am
A resident of the area later claimed he was exposed to harmful gas released by the BioLab fire. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 11:35 am by Alex Moss
That’s why EFF challenged the Federal Circuit’s decision on Friday, petitioning for re-hearing by the panel or the entire court. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Re (a):[2.2] The appellant apparently disputes the publication dates of documents D4, D5 and D6. [read post]
15 May 2011, 11:00 am
”  In re Helen E.F., 2010 AP 2061 (Ct. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:39 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
Additionally, the hospital alleged that the negligence doctrine of res ipsa loquitur did not apply to the facts of the case because numerous third parties had access to the artwork. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 5:44 am
In an unusual situation where a name change case went up on appeal, the Court of Appeals of Georgia, in the case of In re Serpentfoot, affirmed the denial of the appellant's third amended petition to change her name to Ann Serpentfoot-Mooney, holding that the superior court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the appellant failed to demonstrate any appropriate reason for use of the Mooney name and that the name change would harm Burgett Mooney III,… [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 1:30 pm by Alex Ely
” Below, I overview key features of the appeals court’s opinion. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 3:17 pm by Michael W. Huseman
Erika Rahden, NIU-COL Class of 2003, recently prevailed on appeal before the Second District in the case In Re Marriage of Holtorf, 02-09-0872 (January 19, 2010).Erika represented Mr. [read post]
The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Wednesday vacated a preliminary injunction blocking Executive Order 13990. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:02 am by Patricia Salkin
The court further found that there could be a redressable harm at the end of the litigation from the challenge to “adult entertainment establishment. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:42 am by Michelle Kisloff and Adam Cooke
It remains to be seen how the different views of what data breach plaintiffs must allege to establish a substantial risk of future harm—embodied in the recent In re SuperValu and Attias decisions—will play out in the courts. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:04 am by Madeleine Reardon, 1 KBW.
’ The application under the Convention was granted by Pauffley J, and the mother’s appeal to the Court of Appeal was refused. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 11:53 am
Now that we're in the midst of the holiday season, the Court of Appeal lets you know whether it's okay to spank your child with a shoe. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 11:20 am
 Since now there's a "split" in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:51 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Brennan (1994) that the plaintiff only needs to show that the jailers failed to act despite a substantial risk of serious harm to the inmate.The case returns to the district court to give plaintiff a chance to re-plead his Complaint to further develop his claim. [read post]