Search for: "In Re Harm's Appeal" Results 121 - 140 of 5,759
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2021, 7:24 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The district court ruling in the protesters' favor remains in place while the Court of Appeals re-hears the case. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 4:24 pm by Parker Higgins
The appeals court then not only incorrectly construed copyright law to support the idea that Garcia was likely to succeed, but further failed to weigh those chances of success against the harm to the public interest of granting an injunction. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 12:27 pm
  Which is confusing, because the opinion hadn't yet even talked about an MSA -- much less its contents -- and normally, when you say that a party gets "less" money, you're talking about (1).So a bit confusing.On the merits, by the way, I see why the Court of Appeal ends up where it does. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:49 am by SHG
Marquan M., as it sucked the wind out of their best appeals to emotion. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 4:00 pm by Mark Bennett
We’d take it up to the First or Fourteenth Court of Appeals, then to the Court of Criminal Appeals and take a shot at getting the Supreme Court to grant cert on Texas’s novel limitation on free speech on the Internet. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 7:39 am by admin
In re M.A.B. (05-11-00653-CV) – Recites well-established rule that the timely filing of a notice of appeal is jurisdictional. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 6:43 am by Gritsforbreakfast
So bad maybe the Lege should act next year to say that polygraph tests can't be the sole basis for probation revocation, whether they're administered by law enforcement or a therapist at the direction of the court. [read post]
After the ruling, ADF Senior Counsel Christiana Kiefer stated: The 2nd Circuit got it wrong, and we’re evaluating all legal options, including appeal. [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:33 pm by admin
” In the Bureau’s notice of appeal, in which it is seeking that the Tribunal’s order be set aside and the case returned to the Tribunal for re-determination, it argues among other things that the Tribunal erred by: 1. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 10:29 am by familoo
  The Court of Appeal went back to the case of Re S [2004] UKHL 47; [2005] 1 AC 593, which the President relied upon in indicating that Ward should no longer be followed. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
The court also concluded that there is no case or controversy to give it jurisdiction to issue a declaratory judgment and that plaintiffs lack standing to bring their claims, saying in part:The Court can have no influence on the alleged past harm caused by the Restrictions when they have already been terminated years ago.WDEL News reports that plaintiffs plan an appeal to the state Supreme Court. [read post]