Search for: "In Re Interest of CDA"
Results 41 - 60
of 136
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
It is Creative Commons licensed for re-use in teaching materials and elsewhere. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 5:16 am
My interest in the DMCA is in what it's not. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 12:11 pm
Rather, they're arguing that EARN IT will hurt end-to-end encryption. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 9:53 am
Undoubtedly, this case raises all kinds of interesting and important policy issues. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 9:53 am
Undoubtedly, this case raises all kinds of interesting and important policy issues. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 9:54 am
Interesting times. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 9:42 am
This is a free event, so if you're in the area, please come! [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 3:46 pm
They need that in order to justify sweeping immunity as in the case of DMCA 512 and CDA 230. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 11:27 am
Milewski Ripoff Report Hires New General Counsel Ripoff Report Responds re. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 4:43 pm
Plaintiffs haven’t asked US courts to do that, and I doubt they’re likely to. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:34 pm
I still haven’t blogged last year’s In re Social Media Addiction rulings from the California federal and state courts. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 2:40 pm
The online community was outraged by the passage of the CDA. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 5:43 am
” Online immunities for Internet platforms under NAFTA — “While it is not objectionable for Internet platforms to have some immunity for damage claims where they act as passive, neutral intermediaries and are not aware and have no reason to be aware that their actions are causing damages, it would be a major extension of the law and contrary to the public interest to grant Internet platforms the types of immunities provided for by the CDA. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 9:14 am
It will be interesting to see if either the Internet Association or Professor Goldman tries to take the line adopted by Google lawyer Kent Walker (at the Google annual shareholder meeting) and try to get the Congress to believe that the Congress “was striking a blow for Good Samaritan review by Internet platforms” with CDA 230. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 7:30 am
It was a day that saw inboxes across the globe flooded with updated privacy policies and newsletter re-confirmations. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am
You know, consistently, the battles around here are between big interest groups. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 4:58 pm
Paper shows how the 1A helped configure American cyberlaw: CDA §230, DMCA, and a bit on privacy. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 10:53 pm
Even after the CDA’s failure in Reno, Congress passed another law called COPA aimed at restricting minors’ access to harmful material online. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 12:30 am
So far, so so-so, but there’s an interesting use of a famous piece of Internet law that is being followed with great interest in these parts and elsewhere… The section in question is section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA), or the Internet ’shield’ or ‘immunity’ law. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 10:20 am
” We’re not talking about a few snarky tweets or the give and take of robust online debate, even when that debate includes harsh language or obscenities. [read post]
