Search for: "In Re Interest of Griffin"
Results 1 - 20
of 298
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2024, 8:59 am
Court of Appeals, in an opinion by Judge April Wood, joined by Judges Donna Stroud and Jefferson Griffin: Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court's order granting summary judgment for Defendant and dismissing all their claims arising out of Defendant's Executive Order No. 141 issued in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
Decisions about interest rates, Fed officials say, are based solely on how the economy evolves, and whether inflation keeps trending down. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
Justice Chase is hearing a habeas challenge from Griffin, who had been convicted in West Virginia state court. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
Justice Chase is hearing a habeas challenge from Griffin, who had been convicted in West Virginia state court. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
Similarly, Trump will sign various executive orders that may regulate private property interests. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
So assuming that’s what most interests you, you can skip ahead to reaction number 7, below. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
But States have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially the Presidency (Slip op. per curiam, p. 6, §II.B).Yet that was the least interesting part of the opinion, as important as it is given the current circumstances of U.S political life.Far more interesting was what appears to be the dress rehearsal for what comes after. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 8:46 am
Celebrezze, there are distinct interests in having a uniform system for electing the President. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
First, it’s likely that many or all of the Justices will want to preserve states’ authority to prevent rebels and insurrectionists from holding state offices, as New Mexico did in the Couy Griffin case currently pending before the Court. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
United States: the states are disabled from legislating in this area of federal interest. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
If you’re interested, good places to start are Part II-C of the Baude/Paulsen article, and Part I-E of Kim Roosevelt’s amicus brief. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:35 am
Trump relies on a very old circuit court case, In re Griffin (1869), in which Chief Justice Samuel Chase ruled that Section 3 was inoperative until Congress passed enabling legislation. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:27 am
Twin Cities Area New Party, 520 U.S. 351, 364 (1997) (“States certainly have an interest in protecting the integrity, fairness, and efficiency of their ballots and election processes as means for electing public officials. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
“Until Harvard makes it very clear that they’re going to resume their role as [educators of] young American men and women to be leaders, to be problem solvers, to take on difficult issues, I am not interested in supporting the institution” The post Billionaire Ken Griffin Stops Donating to Harvard Due to Its DEI Agenda first appeared on Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman]. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 11:00 am
You may then be wondering why I’m even including Griffin v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
A frolic is a more serious deviation where the employee is acting in his own capacity or for his own interests. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 5:23 am
Griffin [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:55 pm
Griffin (W.D. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
The events surrounding efforts to overturn the result of the presidential election of 2020 have sparked renewed scholarly, judicial, and political interest in Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment.[5] The core events are familiar to all—the dishonest attempts to set aside valid state election results with false claims of voter fraud; the attempted subversion of the constitutional processes for States' selection of electors for President and Vice President; the efforts to have… [read post]
