Search for: "In Re Interest of Laura O."
Results 41 - 60
of 131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2010, 1:32 pm
Laura Malone, Associate General Counsel, Intellectual Property, The Associated Press Nobody thinks copyright caused the problem. [read post]
25 May 2017, 11:49 am
In re Copps Chapel Methodist Episcopal Church, 120 Ohio St. 309, 310 (1929). [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Reactive to lobbying pressure from manufacturing interests. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 11:15 am
Davis and Laura Pendergest-Holt. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 4:33 am
But the employer has a legitimate business interest in ensuring the integrity of the test, and the method Sterilite used was strictly limited that interest. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 4:01 am
Laura Graham, Director of Legal Analysis, Writing, and Research and Professor of Legal Writing, Wake Forest University School of Law Excerpt: Abstract from SSRN and Part 5: Reaching and Teaching Generation Z Law Students [Footnotes omitted; they can be found in the original via the link above.] [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:32 am
El juez Estrella Martínez adujo que una de esas instancias es “for cause, including the lack of adequate protection of an interest in property of such party in interest”. (11 USC 362(d) (1)). [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 12:29 pm
It was interesting to see the stars walk by and who accompanied them to the show. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 11:19 am
Recall that the Ed O'Bannon case was originally about the use of real players' avatars in a video game, which is an actual product with supply and demand driving the fundamentals. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
ECJ tends to say that when you’re assessing whether something is devoid of distinctive character/unregistrable, you use the POV of the consumer, and descriptive things ar [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 12:49 pm
” (But tragically, it seems they’re not alone.) [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 8:22 am
Get a room Gary and Laura you pathetic duck fans. [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:19 am
Interested in refining/defining broad classes in relation to the support in the record. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am
(Interesting that there aren't more IP & antitrust papers at IPSC this year!) [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:00 am
The request could reflect the interest of just one or a small group of the nine justices. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 5:21 pm
It is essential that adequate time is afforded to allow a meaningful analysis of this provision and that all interested parties be given a proper chance to comment. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm
Or more flexibility for new tech and interests as they arise? [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 10:21 am
It has no commercial or national interests at heart; its only interest is the revelation of the truth. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat) Global Global – General Moral… [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
Lemley: don’t assume we’re moving in the right direction. [read post]
