Search for: "In Re Interest of PD"
Results 41 - 60
of 328
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2008, 10:08 pm
"If they make better decisions, regardless of what direction the city or the department or the city takes, you're likely to have better outcomes. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 7:51 am
Tanya Eiserer at the Dallas News has an interesting story today on the Dallas PD's electronic revival of the old-school idea of "hook books":Police have made at least 700 arrests since January through the program of using color-coded charts to track offenders at the street level. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 8:34 pm
One view confrontational view is:“When I’m on trial and we’re in a truly adversarial proceeding, I hate the mother of the victim. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 12:36 pm
I'd be interested in hearing more details of your situation if you're willing in sharing them. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 4:02 pm
I know Audacity was interested too. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 6:35 am
" The Houston Chronicle had a good story localizing the issue, though they're wrong that no one has tried to think of a solution. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 9:55 pm
If you're working-poor and your case doesn't have any special interest to me, you probably aren't going to manage to hire me. [read post]
26 May 2010, 9:12 am
(Incidentally, if you're interested in the overarching concept of the "paperless office", we addressed that previously at the blog, as well, here, specifically.) [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:23 pm
We're losing one of the good gals. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 7:19 am
The PD’s office did the right thing when they identified a potential conflict in the case. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
Trademarks: Now we’re talking! [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 8:04 am
Apparently only defendants in the City are entitled to PDs who are not overburdened.) [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:10 am
- Jason Voiovich, Vice President, Marketing, Logic PD We trade data for access all the time. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 12:31 pm
We're unlikely to find out, regardless. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 4:22 am
A fired scientist at the Austin PD crime lab is making serious, public allegations, including that the lab issued reports in drug cases without performing any lab testing. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:14 pm
And why was interest in the picnic lagging? [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 11:09 am
If I were a local reporter in Amarillo, I'd be looking into that story, which is interesting irrespective of racial breakdowns. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 1:19 am
Much forensic evidence across the country, such as fingerprints or DNA, is analyzed by labs closely tied to law enforcement despite the inherent conflicts of interest, said UCLA law professor Jennifer Mnookin. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 3:57 pm
In "How to Be Excused from Your (Own) Trial," Steve at Alaskablawg links to an "interesting decision," Douglas v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 11:06 am
(UPDATE: Austin PD called back to say the mid-year submission is not mandatory but all their data will be in the year-end UCR report.) [read post]
