Search for: "In Re Interest of PD"
Results 61 - 80
of 328
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2007, 5:11 pm
We're the one's scratching as we read the FLW's. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 9:25 am
Maybe not what we want, but definitely what we deserve.Dennis WilkinsThe Guest PD Blogger [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 8:44 am
First, great posts by PD Dude. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 6:47 pm
You're a PD, you want the cheap stuff and you're tired of drinking the same crap.How's $8.99? [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 2:55 pm
""When I'm on trial and we're in a truly adversarial proceeding, I hate the mother of the victim. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 8:09 pm
The PD has far less resources than the DA and the police combined, and does not have the peace officer powers those two have. [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 11:31 am
I'm also interested in exploring more deeply the origin stories of the earliest Texas law enforcement agencies. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 1:44 pm
If you're a young lawyer interested in defending people in federal court, listen up. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 3:03 pm
Is the PDs office state-funded and decently paid? [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 3:34 am
If the issue is that the police have access to their recording of the hallway deposition, which they can pull out when it serves their interest but will be denied PDs when it doesn’t, that would be understandable. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 9:33 pm
At least, those are the assumptions that underlie what I'm doing, whether they're true or not. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 5:08 am
I have no idea if this is true, but it would be interesting to explore. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 10:32 am
Dennis WilkinsThe Guest PD Blogger [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 10:36 am
Interested in proctoring or tutoring? [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 6:06 am
Some law enforcement interests, to me, inexplicably, have come out against legislation carried by Rep. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 8:58 pm
This means our interests are always tied to that of our Clients. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 11:28 am
" Lots of other fun stuff at LLITLODQ, particularly if you're a fan of women's breasts. [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:35 pm
The point is re-enforced as the defendant’s offer in the S2SP would appear not to attract Part 36 status (as an RTA Protocol Offer) until proceedings are issued under PD 8B and offers made within the S2SP are unlikely to comply with the formal requirements of CPR 36.2. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 11:27 pm
At least we know you're reading the blog. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 6:00 am
There’s a wonderful little history in Modern Gentlemen Magazine (yes, there is such a publication) if you’re interested. [read post]
