Search for: "In Re Iridium Operating LLC"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2007, 3:31 pm
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (In re Iridium Operating LLC), No. 05-2236-bk (2d Cir. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 6:51 am
The Second Circuit has held that the issue of whether a pre-plan settlement in a Chapter 11 bankruptcy meets the requirements of the Bankruptcy Code's priority scheme is the essential factor that a court must consider in deciding whether the settlement can be approved.The Court's decision in In re Iridium Operating, LLC can be found here. [read post]
21 May 2009, 2:20 pm
Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors (In re Iridium Operating, LLC), 478 F.3d 452, 466 (2d Cir.2007). [read post]
4 May 2017, 3:07 pm
While the Court conceded that a bankruptcy court can dismiss a case “for cause”[3]—which typically returns the parties to the status quo ante, and the orders in the bankruptcy case do not survive—and that section 349(b) of the Bankruptcy Code permits a court “for cause, [to] order[] otherwise,” the Court found that the word “cause” “[was] too weak a reed upon which to rest so… [read post]
4 May 2017, 3:07 pm
While the Court conceded that a bankruptcy court can dismiss a case “for cause”[3]—which typically returns the parties to the status quo ante, and the orders in the bankruptcy case do not survive—and that section 349(b) of the Bankruptcy Code permits a court “for cause, [to] order[] otherwise,” the Court found that the word “cause” “[was] too weak a reed upon which to rest so… [read post]
26 May 2015, 6:26 am
The company ceased substantially all of its operations, and its employees received notice of their impending terminations on May 19, 2008. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 2:06 pm
The Third Circuit adopted the Second Circuit’s more flexible approach taken in In re Iridium Operating LLC.[8] This approach allows a bankruptcy court to approve a settlement distribution that contravenes section 507 priorities if the other factors under Bankruptcy Rule 9019 “weigh heavily in favor of approving a settlement. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 2:06 pm
The Third Circuit adopted the Second Circuit’s more flexible approach taken in In re Iridium Operating LLC.[8] This approach allows a bankruptcy court to approve a settlement distribution that contravenes section 507 priorities if the other factors under Bankruptcy Rule 9019 “weigh heavily in favor of approving a settlement. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 8:00 pm
Walker, IN RE IRIDIUM OPERATING LLC AND ITS IMPACT ON SPM CARVE-OUT ARRANGEMENTS, 26-JAN Am. [read post]
4 May 2009, 11:00 pm
Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors (In re Iridium Operating, LLC), 478 F.3d 452 (2007), recently addressed attempts to squeeze out the middle in the context of a settlement that the debtor sought to have approved under Bankruptcy Rule 9019. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 3:38 am
Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit in In re Iridium Operating LLC, which approved an interim priority-deviating settlement on a gifting theory, may give gifting proponents heart. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 7:14 am
The company ceased substantially all of its operations, and its employees received notice of their impending terminations on May 19, 2008. [read post]
