Search for: "In Re J. B"
Results 1 - 20
of 4,224
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
., J.). [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 7:48 am
The case of B v B [2012] EWHC 1924 (Fam), decided today, contains another judicial warning upon the preparation of court bundles. [read post]
6 May 2020, 7:04 am
Criminal procedure — Truancy — Parent’s culpability Jerome B., appellant, (“Father”) was charged in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, sitting as a juvenile court, with violating Md. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 3:59 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit instructed Bankruptcy Court Judge Kaplan to dismiss LTL’s Chapter 11 petition saying it breached Bankruptcy Code section 1112(b)’s good-faith standard: “At base level, LTL, whose employees are all J&J employees, is essentially a shell company ‘formed,’ almost exclusively, ‘to manage and defend thousands of talc-related claims....'"Judge Kaplan officially dismissed the case… [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 2:58 am
The Board affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal to register ELISA B. for various clothing items, including sweaters and dresses, in view of the registered mark LISA B. for various clothing items, including sweaters and dresses. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 3:35 pm
GUSS AND DAVID B. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:11 am
In any case it is worth noting that - even if the High Court of England and Wales on this occasion refrained from making a reference, courts in other Member States appear instead pretty keen on seeking CJEU guidance re interpretation of Article 5(2)(b) of the InfoSoc Directive. [read post]
5 May 2014, 8:32 am
Decision: In re Michael J. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:22 am
In proceedings before the EPO, re-establishment of rights under Article 122 EPC is ruled out in respect of the period under Rule 49ter.2(b)(i) PCT for filing a request for restoration of a right of priority. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:22 am
In proceedings before the EPO, re-establishment of rights under Article 122 EPC is ruled out in respect of the period under Rule 49ter.2(b)(i) PCT for filing a request for restoration of a right of priority. [read post]
27 May 2011, 2:54 am
This week the Supreme Court has been hearing an appeal from the Court of Appeal in Re E (Children.) [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 5:18 pm
In re Regevig, 389 B.R. 736 (Bkrtcy, Ariz, Haines J, June, 2008) Issue: May an Arizona debtor claim California exemptions, otherwise appropriate under Section 522(b)(3)(A)? [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:04 am
Where the protective measures are sufficient (as in Re E they were found to be), the Article 13(b) defence will fail. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 12:39 pm
October 18, 2007)(Schneider, J.) dismissed the debtor's chapter 7 case as an "abuse" under section 707(b)(1) based on the "totality of the circumstances" test of section 707(b)(3). [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 12:30 pm
In re Ryder M. [read post]
4 May 2023, 12:15 pm
(Appeal of termination of parental rights pursuant to General Statutes § 17a-112 (j) (3) (B) (ii)). [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 12:47 pm
(Termination of parental rights; failure to achieve a sufficient degree of personal rehabilitation pursuant to General Statutes § 17a-112 (j) (3) (B) (i); no ongoing parent-child relationship pursuant to § 17a-112 (j) (3) (D)) [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 7:11 am
B, Shepard, C.J. delivers an opinion in which Sullivan, J. concurs and Dickson, J., and Boehm, J., deliver separate opinions.Justice Rucker's opinion begins:A jury convicted Michael Dean Overstreet of murder, rape, and criminal confinement in connection with the 1997 strangulation death of 18-year-old Kelly Eckart. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 9:34 am
Jul. 25, 2011) (Sabraw, J.) [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:51 am
Charles J did not hear oral evidence. [read post]
