Search for: "In Re JJ" Results 21 - 40 of 289
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by Norman L. Eisen
On Thursday, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals held a hearing on whether Rep. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 1:30 pm by Schwartzapfel Lawyers P.C.
If you’re unsure about whether your psychiatric injury is covered under workers’ comp, don’t hesitate to contact Schwartzapfel Lawyers for more information and a free case evaluation. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For that matter, Justices Breyer, Kagan, and Sotomayor, as well as Justice Brown Jackson (while a federal judge), use those canons with increasing frequency in statutory interpretation cases as well.[17]Recognizing that fact, Justice Elena Kagan and a leading nontextualist scholar of statutory interpretation, Professor William Eskridge, have quipped, “[w]e’re all textualists now” (well, before walking that statement back in dissent to this past Term’s environmental… [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
There are strong arguments that the narrow reading of Article 40.6.1(i) and the implication of an unenumerated right into Article 40.3.1 were unnecessary, and that all of the constitutional protections for freedom of speech should be (re-)integrated into Article 40.6.1(i) (see Tom Daly “Strengthening Irish Democracy: A Proposal to Restore Free Speech to Article 40.6.1(i) of the Constitution” (2009) 31 Dublin University Law Journal (ns) 228 (academia); Robert Noonan… [read post]
29 May 2022, 1:02 am by Frank Cranmer
Consistory courts – a cautionary note In Re St Gregory Sudbury [2022] ECC SEI 2, Gau Ch commenced his judgment with advice to the Petitioners which is likely to be of general applicability: “[1]. [read post]
24 May 2022, 6:07 am by David Pocklington
As part of the reordering of our Home Page, we have indexed the posts on L&RUK assisted dying  which we have covered since 2012. [read post]
20 May 2022, 12:43 am by Frank Cranmer
Paczolay and Felici JJ disagreed with the majority’s reasoning in finding no violation of Article 14 read in conjunction with Article 8. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:01 am by Administrator
(Brown, Rowe and Jamal JJ. concurring): “Mr. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
Included are the per curiam opinion, the concurrence of JJ Gorsuch, Thomas and Alito, and the dissenting opinion of JJ Breyer, Sotomayor and Kagan. [read post]