Search for: "In Re JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC. "
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2021, 1:45 am
For example, concerning the most important factor, the relative convenience of the transferee forum for the potential witnesses, Juniper identified 11 witness located in the Northern District of California, while the plaintiff—a company’s whose presence in Texas appeared to be both recent and ephemeral—identified only one witness (In re Juniper Networks, Inc., September 24, 2021, per curiam). [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 2:27 pm
Like other petitions for a writ of mandamus arising from the Western District of Texas, Juniper Networks, Inc. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 1:45 am
For example, concerning the most important factor, the relative convenience of the transferee forum for the potential witnesses, Juniper identified 11 witness located in the Northern District of California, while the plaintiff—a company’s whose presence in Texas appeared to be both recent and ephemeral—identified only one witness (In re Juniper Networks, Inc., September 24, 2021, per curiam). [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:47 am
(proper but inconvenient forum); 22-106 In re: Juniper Networks, Inc. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:15 am
Juniper Networks, Inc., 3-10-cv-04234 (CAND July 23, 2012, Order) (Illston, J.). [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 6:28 am
Defendants in In re A2P SMS Antitrust Litigation are asking the U.S. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 1:58 pm
Juniper Networks Inc., C.A. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
Woo Lae Oak, Inc; Kebab Gyros, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 2:11 am
"Juniper:"Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Delaware that maintains an established place of business at 1120 S Capital of Texas Hwy #120, Austin, TX. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 8:55 am
These options, offered by major card networks like Visa and Mastercard, rely on tokenized cards on file to back up authorizations for payments. . . . [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
Similarly, in granting mandamus in In re Juniper Networks—a precedential decision—the Federal Circuit cited its prior nonprecedential opinion in In re Hulu five times, concluding that “this case is a very close cousin of our recent decisions in Samsung [precedential] and Hulu [nonprecedential], and the disposition of this case is largely dictated by the disposition of those cases. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
International Code Council, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 3:39 am
Google Inc. et al. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 8:35 am
RE 39,947 owned by Johnson Research & Development Co., Inc. and entitled TOY WATER GUN. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 12:32 pm
A: We…quite frankly, we're a small mom-and-pop business, and… we ran out of money. [read post]
