Search for: "In Re JV"
Results 21 - 40
of 157
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2020, 7:37 am
Fans of the blog know that we’re wild about joint ventures: they allow small business contractors to use their size status while, at the same time, leveraging their joint venture partner’s experience and capabilities. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 9:05 pm
They’re essential but invisible. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 7:19 am
& Core Constr, JV II, ASBCA No. 61714 (Jan. 27, 2020). [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:55 am
Flexible offices provide landlords with a great opportunity to diversify their offerings from traditional leases to serviced offices, incentivising them to modernise buildings in more fringe locations and re-position their own brand, either directly or via collaboration, to meet market needs. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 5:24 am
The effort to put into words why the removal of Persky as a JV tennis coach is irrational is hard. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 3:15 pm
You're Banned! [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 5:48 am
Global Dynamics’ appeal argued that GiaMed is not small because (1) it is affiliated with MedTrust and other entities; (2) it is not an eligible mentor-protégé joint venture (JV); (3) GiaMed’s JV lacks specificity such that the exception to joint venture affiliation does not apply; and (4) GiaMed is affiliated with a firm named GiaSpace (a d/b/a of GiaMed for a short period of time). [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 3:03 am
Clarifying JV’s Purpose 8. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 10:07 am
See In re Emoni W., 48 A.3d 1, 6 (Conn. 2012) (ICPC does not apply to out-of-state non-custodial parent); accord In re C.B., 116 Cal. [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:07 pm
MAN-BITE-DOG SCENARIO: WHEN A BUSINESS DOES NOT WANT TO ARBITRATE A DISPUTE WITH A CUSTOMER Carter v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 12:59 pm
WHEN THE LITTLE GUY WANTS TO TAKE THE BIG GUY TO ARBITRATION Here is another rare case where an individual wanted to arbitrate a dispute with a business -- rather than the reverse -- and was thwarted in his quest: Carter v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 1:21 pm
In re OSG Ship Mgmt., Inc., 514 S.W.3d 331, 338 (Tex. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 3:58 am
In my experience, you’re far better off with a licensing deal than a joint venture. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm
UPDATE: Texas Supreme Court denied review 5/24/2019 CLAIM-FRACTURING CUM APPELLATE GALORE Natgasoline LLC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 5:59 am
According to the testimony, the number one reason for which Dragonfly failed to materialize was that the various Dragonfly partners assumed NTT DoCoMo, which already had a license deal with Qualcomm, could provide the Dragonfly JV with a chipset-related license to Qualcomm's standard-essential patents. [read post]
24 Nov 2018, 12:52 pm
The United Nations Accountability and Remedy Project (ARP) was developed through a strongly backed initiative of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 11:43 am
It found that a hard-edged approach is excessively strict, and fails to achieve that balance.It also noted that the "hard-edged" interpretation would be akin to the re-insertion of a “most favoured licensee” clause in the FRAND undertaking. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 1:52 pm
AC JV, LLC, 2018 WL 3769799 (W.D. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 7:53 am
You need to re-think what you are doing because as you get bigger you become a bigger target. [read post]
