Search for: "In Re Jackson" Results 41 - 60 of 4,391
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
I mean, I think that's the fail-safe if you're concerned with the breadth of our arguments, that's one fail-safe which is no matter how broad the standard the Court adopts there is always going to be strict scrutiny at the end of the line to save the government in times where it desperately needs to do the things you're outlining.Justice Jackson said "thank you," and then Mr. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:36 pm by Ilya Somin
UPDATE: In the original version of this post, I accidentally attributed a statement by Justice Elena Kagan to Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:23 pm by Karina Lytvynska
By Iris Ziwei Che In the world of financial instability, the U.S. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:35 pm by Josh Blackman
And it is no surprise where these suits are filed: never in Houston, Dallas, Austin, New Orleans, or Jackson. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:42 am by Beatrice Yahia
” Lewis Jackson reports for Reuters. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Thanks primarily to Jackson’s efforts, the amendment fairly quickly attracted more than forty co-sponsors in the House. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 3:28 am by Jon Hyman
We're doing DEI wrong — via Business Insider Can states legally ban "woke" training in the workplace? [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by Sri Medicherla
Jackson Women’s Health Organization does not affect its statutory authority to develop regulations related to the medical care of veterans. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 2:29 pm by Stewart Baker
Many of the remainder (Kagan, Sotomayor, Jackson) see social media content moderation as understandable, consistent with their own biases, and justified, but they're uneasy about the power of large platforms and reluctant to grant a sweeping immunity from regulation to those companies. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am by Derek T. Muller
I would not go in the path of the majority has done.And then you have the concurring opinion the concurring opinion by Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am by Derek T. Muller
I would not go in the path of the majority has done.And then you have the concurring opinion the concurring opinion by Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm by Josh Blackman
Were Trump re-elected, and contrary to Professor Lederman's hopes and aspirations, the question of whether the President is an "Officer of the United States" will not be "re-consigned to the obscure corners of implausible scholarship. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am by Marty Lederman
”  Perhaps, then, those arguments will be re-consigned to the obscure corners of implausible scholarship from whence they came. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Indeed, some of the objections that went unaddressed were not merely seemingly obvious; they were articulated expressly in the concurrence in the judgment by Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson (hereafter SKJ). [read post]