Search for: "In Re Johnson" Results 221 - 240 of 6,145
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2013, 9:56 pm by Jon Gelman
Allegations Include Off-label Marketing and Kickbacks to Doctors and Pharmacists\Global health care giant Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and its subsidiaries will pay more than $2.2 billion to resolve criminal and civil liability arising from allegations relating to the prescription drugs Risperdal, Invega and Natrecor, including promotion for uses not approved as safe and effective by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and payment of kickbacks to physicians and to the… [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:13 am by PJ Blount
RES. 109 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology in the One Hundred Twelfth Congress. [read post]
16 Apr 2016, 3:42 pm by Steve Kalar
   If you’re mounting a Johnson challenge, you'll find Parnell an accessible and helpful starting point and guide. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 6:46 pm
In my previous post, I reported on the fact that Johnson & Johnson has been dragged into court by the United States Attorney in Boston, accused of hatching an elaborate scheme to press nursing home doctors to prescribe J&J’s anti-psychotic drugs, including Risperdal, to Massachusetts nursing home residents who were not suffering from mental illness or psychosis, but only dementia. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 5:29 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
As Johnson made clear, the mere possibility that “some external force”—here, perhaps an unusual wave or gust—“might conceivably compel” a seamen to let go of a dangerous halyard is not sufficient reason to reject the application of res ipsa loquitur if this would ordinarily not happen in the absence of negligence, and there was no evidence of any such unusual external force.Even without res ispa loqutur, plaintiff still wins, as she has… [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 5:09 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
It wasn’t a severe crash but you never know what you’re walking into,” Johnson said. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 7:08 am by Simon Lester
We are re-emerging after decades of hibernation as a campaigner for global free trade. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 3:35 am by John L. Welch
In re Johnson Controls, Inc., Serial Nos. 77612039 and 77612049 (September 27, 2011) [not precedential].In case you couldn't tell, the mark on the left consists of the three-dimensional knob and display configuration, the bracket on top, and the rectangular shape of the device; the other mark consists of only the knob and display. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 7:14 am
11-16-2008 Indiana:Most people seem to believe that sex offenders have a higher re-offending rate than any other category of criminal. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 6:01 am
Today's case of the day is In Re Brian Edwards Johnson- In 2008 Brian Edwards Johnson was incarcerated in the Kaufman County jail and sustained an injury. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 9:01 pm
A viewpoint from Kristian Lichtenfels, Director at Johnson Capital’s Denver Office (re-printed with permission from Mr. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Think Computer Corp.) on behalf of PlainSite's operator (Think Computer Corp.); an excerpt (and I'll also excerpt Johnson's counterarguments when they're filed): The plaintiff is a prolific pro se litigant who has been criticized for frivolous litigation by several judges among the many who have presided over the many pro se lawsuits that he has filed in the past three decades. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 3:03 pm
A Perspective from Greg Richardson, a Managing Director of Johnson Capital(re-printed with permission from Mr. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
The petition of the day is: In re Sharp 15-646 Issue: (1) Whether Johnson v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 5:05 am by Jack Bogdanski
But this group has money, obviously.Given that they're pounding on inflation and crime, and dissing the Legislature, of which Johnson has been a key part, my guess is that it's the Republicans. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 3:12 am by SHG
But when the crime is based on the exercise of discretion with which someone later disagreed, we’re on very dangerous ground. [read post]