Search for: "In Re Lambert" Results 101 - 120 of 679
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2007, 9:57 pm
In re Gabapentin Patent Litigation, No. 2006-1572 (Fed. [read post]
29 Dec 2007, 7:13 am
Update [2007-12-29 10:54:11 by Big Tent Democrat]: See also Lambert at correntewire. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:19 pm
The point is to prevent you from going completely broke if you are responsible, or even if you're not. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 6:20 am by First Mondays
 Lambert, a nerdy-but-interesting procedural case that arises from some particularly spicy factual allegations. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:43 pm by Bexis
We’re rather tired of the other side, abetted by the flawed reasoning in Desiano v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 2:35 am
Had Warner-Lambert succeeded in upholding valid claims on which they relied for infringement, it would then have been necessary to decide whether, at any of the various dates analysed by the judge, that test of knowledge or foresight was satisfied. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:14 pm by legalinformatics
Also of potential interest are Greg Lambert’s responsive post and Prof. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 8:28 am
Unless you're listed on the first search engine results page … you might as well not exist. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 8:21 am by Cynthia Pittson
LAP Lambert Academic specifically targets student authors, offering to publish their work in exchange for the copyright. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 11:38 am
We're uncertain of her seniority level over there (deputy level?). [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:26 am
Contents include:Pierre Lambert, In memoriam Edouard Jakhian Jean Dhommeaux, La Convention relative aux droits des personnes handicapées et son Protocole du 13 décembre 2006 Andrew Drzemczewski, L’élection du juge de l’Union européenne à la Cour européenne Franck Yonan, La révision du mécanisme conventionnel ACP-UE Olivier Van der Noot, Les travaux de la « Commission on a Bill of Rights » britannique :… [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 3:22 pm
 On Monday this Kat posted "When litigants must be responsible -- and what happens when they're not: Lyrica pregabalin injunction is continued" (here), this being a short note on the decision of Mr Justice Arnold in Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Sandoz GmbH, Sandoz Ltd and Lloyds Pharmcacy Ltd [2015] EWHC 3153 (Pat), in the Patents Court, England and Wales, to extend an interim injunction in an ongoing patent infringement dispute over pregabalin, a generic version of… [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:49 am
…You may owe re-sale right royalties | BREAKING NEWS: Supreme Court unanimously dismisses Warner-Lambert's painful Lyrica appeal | Why is this Kat laughing (hint: it's all about his blue shirt)? [read post]