Search for: "In Re Loring"
Results 41 - 60
of 333
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2007, 9:09 pm
" Paragraph 12 of the Stewart declaration flat out contradicts the Loring declaration (which, in any event, was not considered by the USPTO in the re-exam): "methods used to isolate mouse ES cells ... are not universally applicable" Paragraph 16 of the Stewart declaration deals with LIF. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 2:58 am
Ahhhh, now I know you're not a Wall Street veteran. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 1:11 am
Their mug shots have become a figment of pop culture lore. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 2:02 pm
Awards from good friend and fellow blogger, John Bolch of Family Lore, I accept with pleasure. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 8:07 am
“We aren’t giving up; we’re just taking some time to think. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 2:06 am
Looking through the search queries that find their way to Family Lore I regularly come across the same questions coming up time after time. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 4:43 am
It's our blog - we're entitled.Being lawyers, we're also fans of the Magna Carta. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 2:22 am
Loring's work has received $17.4 million from the agency since 2005. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 9:25 am
So to appease people, specifically Congress, six days after the Pullman strike was broken, the president signed the bill creating Labor Day, but he was not re-elected anyway. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 3:23 pm
UCSF letter re $40 Million California Genomics Round [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 1:52 am
Quinn said the patent office receives 400 to 500 requests for re-examinations each year and grants 90 percent of them.This comment didn't go up. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:18 am
Loree Jr. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 1:52 am
In their best interests, part two: the alarming case of C (A Child)Continuing from the previous post, Marilyn discusses the case Re C (A Child) [2012] EW Misc 15 (CC), which also concerns a parent’s wishes pitted against a child’s. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:09 am
So we look like we’re really part of the court and we’re here to stay. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:13 am
Loree Jr. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:59 am
" Says Marilyn Stowe in this post.I’ve got (section) thirty seven problems, but a ***** ain’t oneA discussion about section 37 of the Children Act 1989 and the pending appeal on Re K (Children) [2012] EWCA Civ 1169. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:48 am
But let’s be honest, as Angelenos we’re used to some of that hustle and bustle. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 7:50 pm
Loring. [read post]
12 May 2013, 5:13 pm
But, even though the patents were narrowed, we still think they're invalid, and thus disagree with the Patent Office's decision to re-issue them in the narrowed forms. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 2:41 am
A discussion of Re CA (A Baby) [2012] EWHC 2190 (Fam) (30 July 2012), from The Not So Big Society.Acting for other solicitors"Lawyers instructing their peers in divorce proceedings should remember that family ? [read post]
