Search for: "In Re M & S Amusement Enterprises"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2024, 5:21 am
It's a pretty wild story. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 8:56 am
Ordinary people did not share Barrett’s “common sense” about the trip to the amusement park (only 8% of percent of respondents believed that the babysitter broke the rule by taking the kids to an amusement park). [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 1:53 pm
The Problems with the Section 809 Panel’s Shocking Proposal If you’re something of an astute reader, you may have picked up on the fact that I’m not particularly wild about the proposal to replace small business set-asides with a five percent price preference. [read post]
7 Apr 2018, 5:03 am
The police were not amused. [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 4:13 am
The Second Circuit was not amused. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 5:30 am
(I’m imagining a pretty solid double-take, and finding it very amusing.) [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 7:38 am
Trademark Scholars’ Roundtable, Boston University Session 1: Product Design Protection and Trademark First PrinciplesGiven what we know about the costs and benefits of using trademark/unfair competition law to protect product design, is the whole enterprise worth the candle? [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm
Any one of these developments would be grave for any normal lawyer or legal enterprise. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 10:25 am
If you’re in the space elevator or artificial retina industries, it’s looking pretty lucrative.02. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 2:31 am
I am constantly generalizing here; I'm talking about "the Americans" and about "the Germans" and I'm aware of the fact that, strictly speaking, these generalizations are wrong; I'm trying to capture a hypothetical average. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:36 pm
The rest of the 1,100 men, the lowly black-and-white stripes, must figure out how to amuse themselves. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:47 am
Comments are open, but I’m particularly interested in informed comments that run to the possible questions of law here. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
I’m from the Treasury, and I’ve got bad news No one likes to hear they won’t be able to afford what they’re previously had or expected, but knowledge or ignorance of finance does not stop its workings. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:20 am
In summary, s.81, 1996 Act requires that, before any notice under s.146, Law of Property Act 1925 (forfeiture) can be served, or any right of re-entry exercised, there must be a "final determination" that the amount of the service charge is due. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:20 am
In summary, s.81, 1996 Act requires that, before any notice under s.146, Law of Property Act 1925 (forfeiture) can be served, or any right of re-entry exercised, there must be a "final determination" that the amount of the service charge is due. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:44 pm
So, I’m an impure property lawyer and quite proud of it. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 11:29 am
So it seems patently unrealistic to me to urge people to spend money unless there's a demand that they're not able to satisfy with their existing resources. [. . .] [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:30 am
I'm told I should read Gregg Easterbrook's The Here and Now, which might well supplant Grisham if I ever get around to it. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 9:03 pm
s information economy. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 10:43 am
” OK, I’m easily amused). [read post]
