Search for: "In Re MacOmber" Results 41 - 60 of 204
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2009, 11:45 am
If they do what they are ordered to do, and don't do anything they're not supposed to do, then at the end of the period set by the Judge, the whole matter is dismissed, and never goes on their Record. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 3:51 am by SHG
We’re talking about threatening a sitting Circuit Court Judge is the original allegation against Mr. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:37 pm by Jeffrey J. Randa
Let's clarify one more thing; I only handle DWLS and DWLR cases where the charge is pending in a Court in Macomb, Oakland or Wayne County. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by crimdefense@hotmail.com
Since the law office of Czarnecki & Taylor is located in Macomb County, downtown Mt. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Jack Bogdanski
Macomber, suggests that it would be unconstitutional to tax property value fluctuation. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 2:48 pm
If you're talking to a lawyer who doesn't sound very convincing or enthused, chances are they aren't the one for you. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 1:31 pm by Jeffrey J. Randa
For this reason, I strictly limit my practice in Criminal Cases to Macomb, Oakland and Wayne Counties. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 11:28 am by Neil H. Buchanan
"  Rather than saying, "Silly me, you're right, so now I'll let my kid get the Covid vaccine," many of them are now saying, "Silly me, you're right, so I'm now against ALL vaccines! [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 4:14 pm by Matt Van Steenkiste
What was first medicine was then criminalized, before being re-legalized for medical purposes at the state level in many states (including Michigan), and has now been decriminalized for recreational purposes in Colorado, Washington, and many Michigan cities. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 8:40 am by Epstein Becker Green
As featured in #WorkforceWednesday:  This week, we’re highlighting the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB’s) crackdown on confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions in severance agreements, a U.S. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 6:41 am by David M. Goldman
  The court in In Re Macomber stated “the rule seeks to avoid intestacy where a will has once been duly executed…”  The court In re Estate of Pratt noted that, “the application of this doctrine would give rise to the rebuttable presumption that the testator would have preferred to revive his earlier charitable bequests rather than let the property go by intestacy. [read post]