Conn. 1997) (The Court concludes that the Committee's filing of the motion to compromise was unnecessary and ill-advised in that 9019(a) refers only to a "trustee" as the proper movant for approval of a compromise and that when the matter between the Committee and the other party had been settled those parties should have simply informed the Court of that fact through the submission of a stipulated proposed order, or other similar device); In re Mako, Inc.,… [read post]