Search for: "In Re Marriage of Baker"
Results 1 - 20
of 155
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2010, 12:37 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0586, 2010 MT 124, IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: LAMOINE R. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 12:41 pm
The Christian bakers taken to court for refusing to make a cake promoting gay marriage say their experience is like living in a dystopian “science fiction” world where the state orders people to say things they do not believe. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 9:51 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0559, 2011 MT 297, IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF RHONDA ELAINE BAKER DAMSCHEN, Joint Petitioner and Appellant, and DONALD DAVID DAMSCHEN, Joint Petitioner and Appellee. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 1:01 am
Over her lifetime she reportedly received approximately 1,500 marriage proposals. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 4:57 pm
In re Marriage of Baker H owns parcels A and B, residing on Parcel A. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 4:12 pm
Baker, 142 S.W.2d 737, 748 (Tenn. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 4:46 am
That notion dates all the way back to a Supreme Court decision in 1890 in the case of In re Burrus. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 8:16 am
In Baker v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 3:30 am
Interestingly, Boucai’s account re-politicizes the litigant couples – as couples – by, in part, desexualizing them. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
The couple now has an eight year old son and a valid marriage license issued in California between the time of In re Marriage Cases and the passage of Proposition 8.Upon marrying Ms. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 8:14 pm
More than five decades ago, the “one-person, one-vote” rulings of the Warren Court, especially Baker v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 1:52 pm
At least we think they’re distinguishable. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:56 am
The relatively painless resolution Sutton seemed to favor at oral argument on August 6, ruling that the one-sentence rejection of a same-sex marriage case in 1972′s Baker v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 6:19 pm
In other words, the interpretation of ILSA is always a marriage between federal statutory law and the contract law of the forum state. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 5:30 pm
Also, over on LXBN, Zosha explains why a federal court upholding same-sex marriage bans could end up being a good thing for gay marriage. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:18 pm
“They’re not particularly anything. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:17 pm
"[O]n at least three other occasions the Civil Rights Division considered the refusal of bakers to create cakes with images that conveyed disapproval of same-sex marriage, along with religious text. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 3:57 am
At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re considers the Court’s discussion of relative standing in Clapper v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:02 pm
But, respectfully, I do not see how we might rescue the Commission from its error....The "other bakers" referred to some other cases in which the Commission did not find a violation (such as where the baker refused to make a cake with an anti-same-sex-marriage message). [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:11 pm
But one of the smartest gay rights litigators I know is Mary Bonauto, the counsel in Gill, who won the Baker case in Vermont and the Goodridge case in Massachusetts. [read post]
