Search for: "In Re Marriage of Clark"
Results 41 - 60
of 112
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2015, 5:12 am
Clark, the Court held that the use of a three-year-old boy’s statements to his teachers at the trial of the man accused of abusing him did not violate the Confrontation Clause. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm
Judge Clark Waddoups correctly noted that the effect of Utah law was to single out as prosecutable those people who solemnized their plural relationships with “the trappings of a religious marriage ceremony. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:43 am
That might be the position, for example, in a case where a marriage broke down at some point after the couple had left secure accommodation, if it appeared that the marriage would probably have broken down, and the applicant would have been rendered homeless, in any event. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:34 am
Her appeal was unanimously allowed by LJs Hale, Clarke, Wilson, Hughes and Hodge. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
Prison chaplains would not be involved, Clark said. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 7:15 am
” At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re continues his posts on last Term’s decision in Lexmark International v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
Clark, “The Union of Law and Equity,”[2] 25 Columbia Law Review 1-10 (1925)· P.S. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 12:24 pm
If they come back they’re yours; if they don’t, they never were. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:09 am
Late last week in In re Marriage of Turk, a unanimous Illinois Supreme Court held that the answer is “yes. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm
Decision: In re David Shawn Clark ___________________________________________________________________________________________ If you believe that you or your company has suffered damages as the result of the negligent conduct of a lawyer, contact Boston Legal Malpractice Lawyer, Keith L. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:30 pm
Notably absent from the Court's analysis was any citation to the United States vs Windsor same-sex marriage decision. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 4:28 pm
With God's help, and with the desire to honor and glorify God, Clark and Anna heard each other and addressed their failures. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 7:43 am
In re Estate of Shipman, No. 26512, 2013 S.D. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:57 pm
They’re fighting words. [read post]
27 Apr 2013, 6:04 pm
In In re Alison Clark, (9th Cir., April 24, 2013), U.S. 9th Circuit Judge Harry Pregerson, acting in his capacity as Chair of the Federal Public Defender Standing Committee, held that the Administrative Office of the United States Courts acted wrongly in denying federal health care benefits to the same-sex spouse of an Oregon assistant federal public defender. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
Full article: Family Law Week.Lucia Clark on Scottish Family Law: To English family lawyers - please be less polite! [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:27 am
Cole, Michigan State University: Call Your Legislator: The Impact of Citizen Contacts on Legislative Voting Mike Bergmaier, Penn State University: From Miscegenation to Contemporary Marriage Equality: Marriage as a Function of Ideological State Apparatuses Lacey Brown, University of West Florida, Chair: Panel: Trayvon Martin and COMMunity: Exploring the Interpretive Frames of the “Stand Your Ground” Law in Shaping 21st Century American Communities Kathryn A. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 12:01 pm
Mukasey, 540 F.3d 909, 910-11 (8th Cir. 2008) (noting Wikipedia’s acknowledgment that, "at any given moment," an entry "could be in the middle of a large edit or it could have been recently vandalized" (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)), and In re Marriage of Lamoure, 132 Cal. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:37 pm
Mukasey, 540 F.3d 909, 910–11 (8th Cir. 2008) (noting Wikipedia’s acknowledgment that, “at any given moment,” an entry “could be in the middle of a large edit or it could have been recently vandalized” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)), and In re Marriage of Lamoure, 132 Cal. [read post]
