Search for: "In Re Marriage of Dickson"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2016, 8:01 am
” In other words, even if you’re 35, that fact alone will not dictate that you are not entitled to permanent alimony if your marriage was a long-term one (17+ years), and you meet all the other legal criteria. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 8:22 pm
In Estate of Young, Madam Justice Dickson identified two issues. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 9:33 am
In Re The Marriage of Virginia (England) Snow v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 9:19 pm
Shepard, C.J. and Dickson and Boehm, JJ., concur. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 10:56 am
"If the two of you are coming in to the marriage and you're both in more or less the same position. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 11:05 pm
Dickson, J., dissents with separate opinion. [read post]
21 May 2010, 8:13 pm
It is not to be confused with the search for “phantom intent” necessary for a resulting trust that Dickson J. decried in Rathwell (at 442-44). [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Smithers.[68] Dickson J. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
Question: You draw amply and ably on the Justices’ “private” papers – some eighty-five-plus endnote citations to the papers of Justices Lewis Powell, Harry Blackmun, and Potter Stewart in addition to numerous references to Del Dickson’s The Supreme Court in Conference: 1940-1985. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am
Case Commented On: KMN v SZM, 2024 BCCA 70 (CanLII), overturning 2023 BCSC 940 (CanLII) We have both written previously on myths and stereotypes about intimate partner violence (IPV), one of the most common of which is that women make false or exaggerated claims of violence to gain an advantage in family law disputes (see here and here). [read post]
