Search for: "In Re Marriage of McCoy"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2009, 2:54 am
McCoy represented plaintiffs in the In re Marriage Cases, the California Supreme Court decision that invalidated statutes limiting marriage to heterosexual couples.This lawsuit [now] claims that section 7.5 of Article I [of the California constitution, setting out the language of Prop. 8] violates the equal protection clause of the State Constitution. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 4:13 pm
Waukeen McCoy, for couples in favor of same-sex marriage: C-. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 11:07 am
re not redefining marriage. ??? [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 10:58 am
By Kelly McClure In McCoy v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 10:58 am
By Kelly McClure In McCoy v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 5:34 am
Ending a marriage often becomes a long, trickly process. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 10:31 am
The plaintiffs' attorney, Waukeen McCoy, represented plaintiffs in the In re Marriage Cases, 43 Cal.4th 757 (Cal. 2008).In Strauss v. [read post]
14 May 2006, 5:01 pm
Yet none pursue black-letter law as well as McCoy. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 7:18 am
A few decisions before McCoy had hinted at the same principle, for example In re Marriage of Thielges in Iowa, In re S.M. in Missouri, Lazarevic v. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 8:02 am
” In re Marriage of Spent, 342 Ill. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
” My project: Have my colleague Richard Re be the subject of In re Re, without his having to be convicted or seized or anything like that. [read post]
13 May 2016, 6:42 am
Supreme Court ruling that effectively legalized same-sex marriage nationwide. [read post]
