Search for: "In Re Marriage of Perry"
Results 1 - 20
of 184
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2011, 2:53 pm
” On Friday, Perry signed the National Organization of Marriage’s anti-gay-marriage pledge. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 5:45 pm
They believe that they must prevent the risk of a ruling, like In re Marriage Cases, 43 Cal.4th 757 (Cal. 2008), that would invalidate the state DOMA. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 5:43 pm
“Now you’re really my auntie. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:20 pm
On April 13, 2011, marriage equality opponents filed a motion in the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 2:12 pm
But since the Windsor and Perry decisions, I have been receiving so many questions that it clearly is time to blog again. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 9:52 pm
But Texas is a very unique place, and we’re a pretty independent lot to boot. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 5:00 am
After just a year of wedded bliss, Katy Perry and Russel Brand called off their marriage. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 6:34 am
They chose not to be remarried in 2008 because of the uncertainty of the marriage performed with Proposition 8 on the ballot, after the Supreme Court of California found in In re Marriage Cases, 43 Cal. 4th 757, that under the state constitution, barring the issuance of marriage licenses was violating same-sex couples’ rights (Perry & Stier, 96-97). [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 1:20 pm
This is why Sanders ultimately supported the City Council resolution in favor of California’s In re Marriage cases. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 1:20 pm
This is why Sanders ultimately supported the City Council resolution in favor of California’s In re Marriage cases. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 5:43 pm
“Now you’re really my auntie. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
The California Supreme Court squashed the practice in about 30-days, voiding all the marriage licenses issued as a result of Gavin's project.In a May 2008 change of course, the California Supreme Court decided (4-3) the case known as In Re Marriage Cases, holding that any California laws, "that treat persons differently because of their sexual orientation should be subjected to strict scrutiny... [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
The California Supreme Court squashed the practice in about 30-days, voiding all the marriage licenses issued as a result of Gavin's project.In a May 2008 change of course, the California Supreme Court decided (4-3) the case known as In Re Marriage Cases, holding that any California laws, "that treat persons differently because of their sexual orientation should be subjected to strict scrutiny... [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 10:30 pm
Perry, which examines whether the State of California violated the Due Process clause when voters enacted a law that prohibited Gay Marriage. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 1:55 pm
If you’re inclined to read them, they’re available at the SCOTUSblog case pages–just click on the links provided in the previous sentence. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 10:05 pm
I support gay marriage. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 10:44 am
I am preparing my "Perry roundups" in an abbreviated format, providing just the title, date, and source of each article. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 5:47 am
Oral argument in Perry v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 8:16 am
Both Chief Justice Marshall in Goodridge and Judge Walker in Perry acknowledged that the new definition they were giving to marriage was not rooted at all in our history and traditions, much less deeply rooted. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 1:36 pm
Perry v. [read post]
