Search for: "In Re Marriage of Perry"
Results 141 - 160
of 184
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2010, 11:08 pm
Perry v Schwarzenegger The decision in Perry was handed down yesterday (August 4, 2010). [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 6:47 pm
The Circuit Court is duty-bound to re-examine, on its own, every legal decision made by the District Court. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 6:55 am
"Perry v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 9:20 am
The other federal case in the picture, of course, is the Perry lawsuit brought by Ted Olson and David Boies out in California, where we’re waiting for a decision from the trial court. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 12:27 am
DHHS, be anxious to take as expansive a reading of Federal power as they can so as to justify the Defense of Marriage Act. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:33 pm
Plaintiffs in Perry v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:26 am
“And we’re pretty sure your mother framed him. [read post]
8 May 2010, 10:39 am
"We’re not talking about mom-and-pop operations here," Bonauto replied, "We’re talking about the federal government. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:17 am
” Observers have also suggested that the decision was more relevant to gay marriage than cameras. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
. * * * * * For ninety percent of readers, everything you’re going to want to know about this post appears above. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
The California Supreme Court squashed the practice in about 30-days, voiding all the marriage licenses issued as a result of Gavin's project.In a May 2008 change of course, the California Supreme Court decided (4-3) the case known as In Re Marriage Cases, holding that any California laws, "that treat persons differently because of their sexual orientation should be subjected to strict scrutiny... [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
The California Supreme Court squashed the practice in about 30-days, voiding all the marriage licenses issued as a result of Gavin's project.In a May 2008 change of course, the California Supreme Court decided (4-3) the case known as In Re Marriage Cases, holding that any California laws, "that treat persons differently because of their sexual orientation should be subjected to strict scrutiny... [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 12:35 pm
Perry v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 1:53 pm
We’re not going to get to 30 or 35 by 2012, but it would be good if we picked up a few more. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:35 pm
Perry v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 11:26 am
There are essentially four possible outcomes in the San Francisco marriage case (Perry v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:56 am
That $28,000 in jewelry bought on a single day during the months before his second marriage. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 12:23 pm
Perry caseUSA Today reports on how Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 9:00 am
She represented San Francisco in In re Marriage Cases, 43 Cal.4th 757 (Cal. 2008) and Strauss v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 10:44 am
I am preparing my "Perry roundups" in an abbreviated format, providing just the title, date, and source of each article. [read post]
