Search for: "In Re Marriage of Powers" Results 21 - 40 of 2,008
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2011, 7:26 am by Tony Infanti
We are a nation ruled by law, not by power hungry, renegade, radical activists. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
  For opponents of same-sex marriage generally, this assertion galvanized forces, imposed time pressure on states to protect themselves from an exported marriage policy, and provided powerful rhetoric to motivate quick legislative reactions. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:33 pm by lgbtlaw blogger
High-powered lawyers Ted Olson and David Boies aren't just litigating same-sex marriage rights in a California federal court room, they're also complementing their litigation strategy with a media campaign to educate ordinary Americans and influence public opinion. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 6:58 pm by Lyle Denniston
”  But, he added, “if we’re under rational basis, I don’t see how you win. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:43 am
The legal documents you'll need:If you're getting marriedConsider a prenuptial agreement, especially if you want to earmark assets for your children from a previous marriage. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Walker, has high-powered lawyers seeking far-reaching relief for the rights of (gay) individuals. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
Walker, has high-powered lawyers seeking far-reaching relief for the rights of (gay) individuals. [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:50 am by Marsha Tesar
In first marriages, working together to raise children can solidify a marriage. [read post]
28 May 2008, 6:19 pm
You simply can't talk to them, because they're hearts and minds are closed. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 4:46 am by Lyle Denniston
  The Supreme Court, those judges argued, took away that power forty-two years ago. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 6:04 pm
His marriage to Isabel was his second marriage, and Janet was his daughter from a previous marriage. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
There appears to be an abiding assumption that that is the central constitutional dispute, and its outcome will make it easy for the Court to answer the second question: the power to refuse to recognize existing same-sex marriages. [read post]