Search for: "In Re Mnr" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2012, 3:36 am by Dianne Saxe
As a result of concerns raised during the last round of amendments (July 1), these amendments focus on: Re-issuance of draft site plans to reflect changes to the location of wind turbines, without having to consider new noise receptors; Limiting “stopping the clock” for judicial review, and Natural Heritage Amendments Re-issuance of draft site plans to reflect changes to the location of wind turbines As proposed, O. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 10:30 am by Jennifer Simon, Esq.
The MNR has not yet established a competitive application process to govern the issuance of submerged land leases, which give developers site control to conduct environment and meteorological testing on their proposed site. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 4:58 am by Dianne Saxe
At only 3.8 million trees planted a year, we’re not likely to ever get there. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Neither of them had a valid Outdoor Card, a valid hunting licence to hunt moose, or a validation tag issued by the MNR. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:33 am by F. Tim Knight
” He explained it like this: “Law is what the courts do, if you predict what the courts do you’re predicting the law. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
MNR, the court said “an unreasonably generous weighing of tenuous evidence will be set aside”. [read post]