Search for: "In Re Naomi B."
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2007, 1:07 am
Nor did Chief Justice Roger B. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 3:03 am
Naomi's both a Senior Fellow at the Evan B. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:43 am
February 5, 2007Re: The Preternaturally Prolific Posner on Plagiarism.From: Dean Lawrence R. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:08 am
Re St. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 8:25 am
Rothman, John B. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:53 pm
Fanworks are regularly transformative—even when they’re celebratory, they create new readings and meanings for the originals that inspired them. [read post]
15 Aug 2006, 1:26 am
Cummings John B. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 10:48 am
We're all getting twitchily excited in European trade mark circles (remember: a circle is something you go round and round in, notes Merpel) about Case C? [read post]
20 May 2011, 7:42 pm
Res. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 2:37 pm
Thus, the state sometimes re-asserts itself and takes back some of the responsibilities for the private ecosystem to protect its own people. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am
Hammond, Robert B. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 3:00 pm
"And whether you're browsing for books, listening to your favorite author read from his or her work, or attending one of the fascinating panels made up of literati of every stripe, Brooklyn is the place to be for booklovers from around the world. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 7:44 am
Davies, Alexandra B. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:44 am
AUTHOR Cahn, Naomi R. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:32 pm
The Data Protection Act 1998 (“DPA”), s.32(1)(b) was also applicable as Hello magazine would have to prove it reasonably believed that publication of the photos was in the public interest. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
Okla.) recently considered whether to approve a compromise in In re Gordon, the contending lawyers in the Chapter 7 proceeding detoured into written lawyer-on-lawyer invective. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
– conflicting formula trademarks(IP Factor) Naomi Ragen fights back – plagiarism claims (IP Factor) Draconian prior art disclosure requirements slightly eased (IP Factor) Finnegan patent litigation seminar in Israel sets new standards (IP Factor) Montenegro Is your Montenegrin mark an old Serbian one? [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
– conflicting formula trademarks(IP Factor) Naomi Ragen fights back – plagiarism claims (IP Factor) Draconian prior art disclosure requirements slightly eased (IP Factor) Finnegan patent litigation seminar in Israel sets new standards (IP Factor) Montenegro Is your Montenegrin mark an old Serbian one? [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
The defendant’s earliest registrations were registered from May 2016, though the claim appeared to have kicked off in 2021 (although I could not identify exactly when from the judgment).The judge devoted a good 20-something paragraphs to this issue, eventually concluding that the relevant date was 26 July 2019, because this was the earliest date – on the facts – by which the claimant knew of both: (a) the defendant’s use of its 2015 mark; and (b) the existence of the… [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Aside from Youngkin each are facing re-election fights this year. [read post]
