Search for: "In Re Norplant Contraceptive Products"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2015, 7:00 am
See In re Norplant Contraceptive Products Litigation, 165 F.3d 374, 379 (5th Cir. 1999) (applying Texas law), which debunks this purported "exception" at some length. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
Ohio 2009) warranty; privityIn re Zyprexa Products Liability Litigation, 649 F. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 10:30 am
In re Norplant Contraceptive Prods. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
So we like to think that by this time we're familiar with all the arguments, pro and con. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:35 am
Id. at 1313.A classic "type one" mass tort example of the "you failed to warn about something else" claim arose in In re Rezulin Products Liability Litigation, 331 F. [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:40 pm
”In re Norplant Contraceptive Products Liability Litigation, 1997 WL 80527 (E.D. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Kan. 1996).In re Norplant Contraceptive Products Liability Litigation, 168 F.R.D. 577 (E.D. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:50 pm
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., 353 F.3d 848, 852 (10th Cir. 2003); In re Norplant Contraceptive Products Liability Litigation, 955 F. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 1:42 pm
See In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, 647 F. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:49 pm
Personal injury case.In re Norplant Contraceptive Products Liability Litigation, 173 F.R.D. 185 (E.D. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 6:58 am
The Fifth Circuit, predicting that the Texas Supreme Court would do the same, held that the learned intermediary doctrine barred consumer fraud claims in In re NorPlant Contraceptives Prods. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 11:55 am
Two of our cases applying Texas law in this area have concluded that, as long as a physician-patient relationship exists, the learned intermediary doctrine applies.In re Norplant Contraceptive Products Litigation, 165 F.3d 374, 379 (5th Cir. 1999) (citations omitted).Murthy did not follow the Fifth Circuit, which it was bound by stare decisis to do, but instead followed a recent intermediate Texas appellate decision, Centocor, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:23 pm
In re Norplant Contraceptive Products Litigation, 165 F.3d 374, 379 (5th Cir. 1999) (rejecting “aggressive marketing’ to consumers as exception; “as long as a physician-patient relationship exists, the learned intermediary doctrine applies”) (applying Texas law); Ebel v. [read post]
