Search for: "In Re Norplant Contraceptive Products Liability"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
Ohio 2009) warranty; privityIn re Zyprexa Products Liability Litigation, 649 F. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Kan. 1996).In re Norplant Contraceptive Products Liability Litigation, 168 F.R.D. 577 (E.D. [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:40 pm
”In re Norplant Contraceptive Products Liability Litigation, 1997 WL 80527 (E.D. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:35 am
Id. at 1313.A classic "type one" mass tort example of the "you failed to warn about something else" claim arose in In re Rezulin Products Liability Litigation, 331 F. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
It ensures harmonious operation of state product liability law with the "unique system used to distribute prescription [products]. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 10:30 am
In re Norplant Contraceptive Prods. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:50 pm
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., 353 F.3d 848, 852 (10th Cir. 2003); In re Norplant Contraceptive Products Liability Litigation, 955 F. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 11:55 am
Two of our cases applying Texas law in this area have concluded that, as long as a physician-patient relationship exists, the learned intermediary doctrine applies.In re Norplant Contraceptive Products Litigation, 165 F.3d 374, 379 (5th Cir. 1999) (citations omitted).Murthy did not follow the Fifth Circuit, which it was bound by stare decisis to do, but instead followed a recent intermediate Texas appellate decision, Centocor, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 1:42 pm
See In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, 647 F. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:49 pm
Personal injury case.In re Norplant Contraceptive Products Liability Litigation, 173 F.R.D. 185 (E.D. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 6:58 am
The Fifth Circuit, predicting that the Texas Supreme Court would do the same, held that the learned intermediary doctrine barred consumer fraud claims in In re NorPlant Contraceptives Prods. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:23 pm
In re Norplant Contraceptive Products Litigation, 165 F.3d 374, 379 (5th Cir. 1999) (rejecting “aggressive marketing’ to consumers as exception; “as long as a physician-patient relationship exists, the learned intermediary doctrine applies”) (applying Texas law); Ebel v. [read post]
