Search for: "In Re Opinion of the Justices"
Results 1 - 20
of 13,998
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2024, 3:45 am
It was effectively a “Trust us, we’re the government” assurance. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm
Second, it is true that in 1995, the Office of Legal Counsel suggested in an opinion that the federal bribery statute, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm
“We’re writing a rule for the ages,” Justice Neil Gorsuch says. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 12:07 pm
Justice Brett Kavanaugh elicited laughs when he asked if he had to “buy anything you just said on net neutrality” in order to rule in favor of the social-media companies. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:52 am
Justice Department’s (DOJ) Antitrust Division, and a former FTC general counsel. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:28 am
Early in Lisa Blatt’s argument for Starbucks, Justice Sonia Sotomayor commented, “I do understand why that needs to be corrected because you’re right, it’s the court that has to decide the likelihood of [success] on the merits. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division. https://www.loc.gov/item/2017657589/ Decision The Supreme Court initially heard the case in December 1952, but the justices did not reach a decision by the end of the term and the case was re-argued in December 1953. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 8:49 am
In other words, five out of seven Justices seemingly share this opinion that there are “cases that would warrant the permanent revocation of an attorney’s license to practice law. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
It proposes to dismantle or radically overhaul the Departments of Justice and State; eliminate the Departments of Homeland Security, Education, and Commerce; radically repurpose other agencies; and eviscerate the professional civil service. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 12:05 pm
Can you tell me a bit about the situation for press freedom in the context in which you’re working? [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 12:06 am
Whether they’re in Micronesia or Australia, it doesn’t matter. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:30 pm
This opinion of the California Supreme Court -- in response to the Ninth Circuit's certified question -- is unanimous, and reading Justice Evans' opinion, you can potentially see why. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 8:30 am
So, for example, Justice Barrett’s lovely opinion for the unanimous Court in Lindke v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Speaking through Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the Justices elaborated upon their less constricted version of the “authority or duty” test in a way that provides some guidance to government officials. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:06 am
In his criminal trial, which was aborted and not re-tried due to concerns about the Lehrmann’s mental health, the former Staffer had pleaded not guilty. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 5:50 pm
Gather Evidence: Collect any evidence supporting your claim, such as medical records, witness statements, and expert opinions. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 4:04 am
The new rules are finally here, and they’re about as bad as everyone expected. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
SOQUIJ is attached to the Québec Department of Justice and collects, analyzes, enriches, and disseminates legal information in Québec. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 3:54 am
He added that “if you can’t stick to that, we’re going to have to see if there is anything else we can do to keep the jurors safe. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:05 pm
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
