Search for: "In Re Opinion of the Justices."
Results 81 - 100
of 14,004
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2024, 7:44 am
Most legal tech startups make bold declarations about public interest, access to justice and democratizing the law when it suits them. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:13 am
And you're not proclaiming righteous opinions, you're exerting power, intimidating people. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 4:32 am
The Appellate Division last week in Behler v Tao (read here) affirmed the order below in a 3-2 decision featuring a majority opinion authored by Presiding Justice Sallie Manzanet-Daniels, applying what she labels “explicitly contractarian” Delaware LLC law “sometimes leading to harsh results,” and a dissenting opinion authored by Justice Ellen Gesmer exalting “basic principles of contract law and fundamental fairness. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:35 pm
[It will be harder for conservative litigants in blue states and liberal litigants in red states to obtain statewide relief. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:39 am
Simply “liking” or re-tweeting official policy is less likely to be seen as an official act. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 3:16 pm
On Thursday, the Justice Commission published a new opinion on the proposal. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 2:33 pm
First, in front of a crowd comprising Wonka’s intrigued prospective customers, Slugworth declares his expert opinion: “Mr. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 12:30 pm
Please enjoy the latest edition of Short Circuit, a weekly feature written by a bunch of people at the Institute for Justice. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 11:28 am
(Or perhaps different justices who joined the unanimous majority read the Sixth Circuit's test differently, even as they all agree what the test should be.) [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 6:24 am
One plaintiff, they note, was “censored” after she re-published a post by Robert F. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 7:33 pm
Here are some key mistakes to avoid when navigating this complex legal terrain, especially if you’re considering seeking justice in Texas. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
(I'll add that Justice Bromberg joins Justice Danner's opinion -- my, what an incredibly smart panel, by the way.) [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:46 pm
AI systems: deploying subliminal, manipulative, or deceptive techniques to distort behaviour and impair informed decision-making, causing significant harm.exploiting vulnerabilities related to age, disability, or socio-economic circumstances to distort behaviour, causing significant harm.biometric categorisation systems inferring sensitive attributes (race, political opinions, trade union membership, religious or philosophical beliefs, sex life, or sexual orientation), except… [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm
Some legal terms used in our Minnesota criminal justice system are difficult for people to understand. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 1:46 pm
Then Justice Goldman adds a brief three-page concurrence that suggests helpful ways that the parties can help assemble the record in such cases, with a suggestion that the Judicial Council get involved.All great thoughts.But everyone joins Justice Streeter's opinion, and everyone joins Justice Goldman's concurrence.So why not just issue one opinion with both thoughts? [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:37 am
In re Kivett, 309 N.C. 635, 670, 309 S.E.2d 442, 462 (1983). [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
” This is, in fact, precisely how Justice Alito’s opinion in Brnovich v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 5:55 am
Unlike previous cases in which the use of such decisive language might have been appropriate (see e.g., the 1971 Namibia advisory opinion which alluded to immediate withdrawal of South African administration and Security Council Res. 660 (1990) demanding that Iraq withdraw from Kuwait immediately and unconditionally), the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict do not easily lend themselves to such a sweeping formulation. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:55 am
” In re Bowe, No. 22-7871 (U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 12:57 pm
Modern standing law, particularly as grounded in Justice Scalia's Lujan opinion, has been generally viewed as a conservative jurisprudential project. [read post]
