Search for: "In Re Oppedahl & Larson Llp"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2010, 10:20 am
In re Oppedahl & Larson LLP, 373 F.3d 1171, 71 USPQ2d1370 (Fed. [read post]
3 May 2020, 8:51 am
See, In re Oppedahl & Larson LLP, 373 F.3d 1171 (Fed. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:00 am
’” In re Fat Boys Water Sports LLC, 118 U.S.P.Q.2d 1511, 1515-16 (T.T.A.B. 2016) (quoting In re Oppedahl & Larson LLP, 373 F.3d 1171, 71 U.S.P.Q.2d 1370, 1372 (Fed. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:48 am
”) (citing In re Oppedahl & Larson LLP, 373 F.3d 1171, 71 USPQ2d 1370, 1374 (Fed. [read post]
12 Jul 2005, 1:00 am
" However, the CAFC shot down that approach last year in In re Oppedahl & Larson LLP, 71 USPQ2d 1370 (Fed. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 3:34 am
” In re Oppedahl & Larson LLP, 71 U.S.P.Q.2d 1370, 1372 (Fed. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 11:08 pm
Cir. 2012) (quoting In re Oppedahl & Larson LLP, 373 F.3d 1171, 1173, 71 USPQ2d 1370, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
28 Feb 2006, 11:42 pm
Cir. 2005)), and PATENTS.COM (In re Oppedahl & Larson LLP, 71 USPQ2d 1370 (Fed. [read post]
