Search for: "In Re Pension Cases"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,231
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2010, 3:00 am
The first case we will look at is The Pension Committee of the Montreal Pension Plan v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 3:37 pm
We’re still not done with that wave of litigation but we’re seeing a similar rise in litigation for pension overpayments in which employers are pursuing retirees for allegedly overpaid pension benefits based upon shoddy recordkeeping, payment systems and benefit calculations (once again the richly paid recordkeepers like Fidelity Investments and AONHewitt find themselves caught up in the plan administrator’s problems.) [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:48 am
HR Trustees Ltd v German and another; In re IMG Pension Plan [2010] EWCA Civ 1349; [2010] WLR (D) 307 “Section 91 of the Pensions Act 1995 as amended prevented neither the parties from making nor the court from approving or enforcing a bona fide compromise of any disputed or doubted right and entitlement of members of the scheme under an occupational pension scheme. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 7:31 am
This is not the case for public unions. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:40 am
However, this may not always be the case. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 8:00 pm
Indalex pension plans The facts in the case are quite complicated. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 4:55 pm
You’re getting a pension: What are your payment options? [read post]
2 May 2018, 12:57 pm
(If you’re paying attention, yes, this means that if your only income is social security, you automatically qualify for Chapter 7). [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 12:30 pm
If you’re anything like me, then the world of investments and pensions is something alien. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 7:36 pm
It is well reported that Avon Pension Fund, administered by the Bath & North East Somerset Council, is to lead the In re GSK securities class action (Financial Times, Legal Week, Pensions & Investments, The Times) and less well that this is the latest addition to the list of ‘f-cubed’ cases. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 1:44 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada overturned the Ontario Court of Appeal today in what is one of the most highly-anticipated cases for the pension and insolvency bars pending before the courts. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 6:46 am
Your pension should always be included in the financial settlement, whether you’re divorcing or dissolving a civil partnership. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 10:30 am
This is overstating the effect of the case. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 9:03 am
It does, however, reveal the importance of the O’Brien case (part-time judges’ entitlement to pensions). [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:58 am
Even though VA pension benefits sound similar to traditional job pensions, they’re not affected by how many years you served in the military. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 6:30 am
In that case, perhaps you'd like Plan B, in which you receive only $500 a month, hut your widow or widower would continue to receive a benefit after you're gone. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 7:35 am
In most cases, we recommend hiring a professional actuary to value the pension plan. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:15 am
“I have often marvelled myself at the interest in pension law,” Andrew Hatnay of Toronto’s Koskie Minsky LLP said at the Canadian Bar Association conference in Halifax.It’s no surprise, then, that there’s been so much discussion around the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Re: Indalex Ltd., a case Hatnay was involved in and spoke about during a session on disputes over underfunded pension plans. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 2:54 am
In re Nortel GmbH and related companies; In re Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (in administration) and related companies [2010] EWHC 3010 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 324 “Liabilities arising from the financial support direction (‘FSD’) regime created by the Pensions Act 2004 upon companies in administration or liquidation were payable as a liquidation or administration expense. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 9:38 pm
Abbott Laboratories (10th Cir., July 31, 2015)(affirming summary judgement against Didier on claims for sexual discrimination, FMLA interference, and retaliation) *Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
