Search for: "In Re Petition of Doe"
Results 41 - 60
of 7,671
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2011, 11:21 am
If any other paid petitions are re-distributed for this conference, we will add them below as soon as their re-distribution is noted on the docket. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 11:11 am
Opinion below (3d Circuit) Petition for ceriorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Other petitions from earlier editions of Petitions to Watch were re-listed for the October 30 conference: Wong v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm
§ 204.5(e) does not permit the retention of that visa petition’s January 10, 2006 priority date. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 10:35 am
Of course, you’re probably asking for more than just a divorce. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:54 am
If any other petitions are re-distributed between now and the conference, we will add them below as soon as their re-distribution is noted on the docket. [read post]
3 May 2023, 11:54 am
This would make some sense if whether a petition received comments indicated that the SEC would respond to a petition for rulemaking, but the data does not appear to support such a conclusion. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:00 pm
Kappos, Mayo has petitioned the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to sit en banc to re-hear its statutory subject matter challenge to the Prometheus patents. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:26 am
So, if you’re going to pay the price of a Petition, you might as well call it a Petition. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 8:05 am
Whenever a mistake of a clerical or typographical nature, or of minor character, which was not the fault of the [PTO], appears in a patent and a showing has been made that such mistake occurred in good faith, the Director may, upon payment of the required fee, issue a certificate of correction, if the correction does not involve such changes in the patent as would constitute new matter or would require re-examination. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:57 am
If any other paid petitions are re-distributed for this conference, we will add them below as soon as their re-distribution is noted on the docket. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:30 pm
The following petitions have been re-listed for the conference of June 9. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 5:54 pm
If any other paid petitions are re-distributed for this conference, we will add them below as soon as their re-distribution is noted on the docket. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:12 pm
If any other paid petitions are re-distributed for this conference, we will add them below as soon as their re-distribution is noted on the docket. [read post]
17 May 2011, 6:38 pm
If any other paid petitions are re-distributed for this conference, we will add them below as soon as their re-distribution is noted on the docket. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
The Board (here) found that the petition was barred by res judicata (claim preclusion) in light of a federal court default judgment entered against Nasalok in Nylok's trademark infringement action. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
If any other paid petitions are re-distributed for this conference, we will add them below as soon as their re-distribution is noted on the docket. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Issue: Does the Equal Access Act preclude a school from applying its non-discrimination policy to exclude religious groups from official recognition and does this restriction trigger strict scrutiny? [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am
(2) Does Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act violate the First Amendment of the United States Constitution? [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 4:41 am
The Administration does not support blowing up planets. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 10:08 am
Opinion below, opinion below denying rehearing (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply The Court has re-listed the following cases from previous editions of Petitions to Watch for the conference of March 19, 2010. [read post]
