Search for: "In Re Petition of Doe"
Results 61 - 80
of 7,671
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2009, 5:59 pm
Opinion below (3d Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Other petitions from earlier editions of Petitions to Watch were re-listed for the October 19 conference: Kiyemba v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:54 pm
If any other paid petitions are re-distributed for this conference, we will add them below as soon as their re-distribution is noted on the docket. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
The petitions and conditional cross-petition for a writ of certiorari in Nos. 10-929, 10-931, and 10-932 concern the boundaries of that reservation. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:14 pm
Both the New York and California bankruptcy courts ruled that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) does not prevent same-sex couples from filing a joint petition because DOMA is allegedly unconstitutional. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 2:38 pm
Simply because you declare real estate to be a trust asset does not formally make it a trust asset. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:02 am
United StatesDocket: 10-150Issue(s): Whether the Supreme Court can review a decision by a court of appeals that it lacks jurisdiction to review a federal prisoner’s motion based on newly discovered evidence that the prisoner is mentally retarded and therefore constitutionally ineligible for execution, even if that evidence does not negate the prisoner’s guilt; whether, if AEDPA precludes a successive habeas petition in such a scenario, it is… [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 4:50 am
The Court has re-listed the following cases from previous editions of Petitions to Watch for the conference of April 2. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 8:59 am
BAP 2007), In re Schiliro, 72. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:13 am
Ferrari Docket: 08-1120 Issue: Does the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 preempt a design defect state-law claim against a vaccine manufacturer? [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:49 pm
” Opinion below (1st Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Amicus brief of the American Hospital Association Amicus brief of the Washington Legal Foundation Amicus brief of the United States (deny) Supplemental brief for petitioners The Court has re-listed the following cases from previous editions of Petitions to Watch for the conference of June 17. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 2:00 am
The vote rejecting the petition was surprisingly close, 7 to 6, with two abstentions. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
United States Docket: 09-293 Issue: Whether a litigant moving to re-open a suppression hearing to introduce additional evidence must justify his failure to introduce that evidence at the initial hearing. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 8:57 am
<> In Re: U.S. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am
Williams (09-466), below, was re-scheduled for review at the January 22 conference. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 10:07 am
Thus, § 315(b) does not bar institution of inter partes review based on HP's Petition." [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 9:03 am
The Federal Circuit denied Aputure’s petition. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 11:57 am
We're still quite a ways from such a ruling, but now the train has pulled into the station... [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 10:00 pm
Harvard Law School’s Animal Law & Policy Clinic (Clinic) submitted a petition on June 9 to the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), urging it to adopt a labeling approach for the emerging category of cell-based meat and poultry that “does not overly restrict speech and that respects the First Amendment. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 10:00 pm
Harvard Law School’s Animal Law & Policy Clinic (Clinic) submitted a petition on June 9 to the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), urging it to adopt a labeling approach for the emerging category of cell-based meat and poultry that “does not overly restrict speech and that respects the First Amendment. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 10:00 pm
Harvard Law School’s Animal Law & Policy Clinic (Clinic) submitted a petition on June 9 to the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), urging it to adopt a labeling approach for the emerging category of cell-based meat and poultry that “does not overly restrict speech and that respects the First Amendment. [read post]
