Search for: "In Re Petition of Doe"
Results 101 - 120
of 7,678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2008, 7:38 am
Does this mean (as my co-blogger Jeremy Rosen has suggested) that the Supreme Court is planning to issue a summary reversal and they're taking additional time to draft their opinion? [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 7:40 am
Therefore, it is ample basis for re-examination of Koushal per Navneet Kaur.National Commission for Women v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:18 am
Similarly, Hill would have been an open-and-shut case unworthy of certiorari review because its 8-foot separation zone is far less than the 36 feet approved in Madsen.The cert. petition has been re-distributed to the Supreme Court for consideration at their March 5 conference. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 1:10 pm
But it does not follow, as some have thought, that the courts will in fact allow the lists of petition signatories to be released. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 5:36 am
“[S]ection 2-1009 does not automatically immunize a plaintiff against the bar of res judicata or any other legitimate defenses a defendant may assert in response to the refiling of voluntarily dismissed counts. [read post]
11 May 2021, 1:44 pm
So what does this mean? [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:27 am
Vincent Howard and our Rancho Cucamonga consumer bankruptcy attorneys were interested to see an appeals case giving a debtor the opportunity to repay a post-petition tax debt as if it were pre-petition. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
In In re Jared Woodfill, et. al. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 2:31 pm
But this does not mean we can rest easy. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:37 am
An alleged violation cannot be fundamental, in the sense of 'intolerable', if it does not cause an adverse effect. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:37 am
An alleged violation cannot be fundamental, in the sense of 'intolerable', if it does not cause an adverse effect. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 9:19 pm
Many of us are surprised that it does not exist. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 9:11 pm
Apple, 15-777, which we're guessing is being closely watched by the IP crowd. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 12:46 pm
If you’re contemplating ending your marriage, you may be wondering: How long does a divorce take in Washington State? [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 7:23 am
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 9:14 am
The Eleventh Circuit in this case held that Dewsnup does not extend to junior liens; several other courts of appeals have held that it does. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 9:02 am
Since there is no vacancy existing, the mandate of section 151 (A) does not have any effect. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:45 am
Ct.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of National Association of Criminal Defense LawyersAmicus brief of Criminal Law ProfessorsReply of petitioner ________________________________________________________________ The following petitions have been re-listed for the conference of May 17. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 4:00 pm
Petition for certiorari Brief in oppositionReply of petitioner R.J. [read post]
