Search for: "In Re Petition of Doe"
Results 121 - 140
of 7,682
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2019, 3:50 am
The Supreme Court resolved this issue by finding that a domestic abuse petition brought on an emergency basis “does not represent a final adjudication of the merits of the action. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 2:04 pm
Guess we're about to find out… [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:56 am
Plaintiff responded to this motion by (1) petitioning the bankruptcy court to re-open the bankruptcy and (2) filing a motion to amend the complaint to add the bankruptcy trustee as a party plaintiff. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 1:40 am
The petition also points out the Williamson County Catch-22 where the very action that ripens a federal claim (denial of compensation by the state court) is also the action that renders the federal claim res judicata. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 7:00 am
Scenario 1: You and your spouse both agree to get a divorce and you’re filing a joint petition for divorce (an uncontested divorce). [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 6:45 am
The Ninth Circuit’s order granting the Respondent’s petition that the case be re-heard en banc does not provide an explanation for its decision. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:22 pm
APPLICABLE COMMITMENT PERIOD IS FIXED AS DATE OF FILING In re Moore, Case No. 06-20031 April 2007, Judge Berger Debtors’ circumstances changed post petition pre confirmation. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 9:05 am
Intent is still needed but that showing of intent probably does not have to be as specific as it used to. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:30 pm
Doe and Apprendi v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:52 am
It could replace the current procedures for federal recognition (for reference, here), but does not allow previously denied “Indian groups” from re-petitioning for federal recognition under the new act (if this bill passes), nor does it have an avenue to challenge a denial/negative finding. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:20 pm
Petition for certiorari Brief in oppositionAmicus brief of the Innocence Network Amicus brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers Amicus brief of Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers (forthcoming)Reply of petitioner ________________________________________________________________ The following petition has been re-listed for the conference of May 10. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
In re Padilla, No. 06-03609 SDTX (August 6, 2007) Judge Marvin Isgur ruled that a mortgage lender is required to file an application pursuant to 2016a to collect post-petition expenses for money expended to protect its interests in property securing its loan. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 8:12 pm
If you're interested in patent law, equity, or remedies, this case could matter to you. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:00 am
Does 35 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Dec 2005, 12:39 pm
In re Gee, No. 05-71886-drd (Oct. 26, 2005). [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:02 am
§ 1623; (2) whether a court must undertake conflict preemption analysis after concluding that an express preemption provision does not apply in a case involving both types of preemption claims. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:15 pm
Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionSupplemental brief of petitionerReply of petitionerCVSG Information:Invited: November 7, 2011Filed: April 25, 2012 (Deny) ________________________________________________________________ The following petitions have been re-listed for the conference of May 24. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 4:57 am
In re Victor Hill, Ch. 7 Case No. 08-86567-crm (filed Dec. 30, 2008) (download petition here). [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm
§ 204.5(e) does not permit the retention of that visa petition’s January 10, 2006 priority date. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:59 pm
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. [read post]
