Search for: "In Re Proposed Initiative 1996-4" Results 1 - 20 of 231
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
State, 689So.2d 239 (Fla. 1996), cert. denied, Henyard v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 4:54 pm
Luckern issued the heavily redacted public version of his 245 page August 14, 2009 Final Initial and Recommended Determinations ("ID") in Certain 3G Mobile Handsets and Components (Inv. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 2:26 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The Supreme Court has indirectly chided itself in derailing the 1996 Act by observing that if Section 87 in its present form is enacted, it “would mean that in all matters which are in the pipeline, despite the fact that Section 34 proceedings have been initiated only after 23rd October, 2015, yet, the old law would continue to apply resulting in delay of disposal of arbitration proceedings by increased interference of Courts, which ultimately defeats the object of the… [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 1:07 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
The sponsor submitted a brief supporting the validity of the initiative petition. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:41 pm by Steven Hansen
This "proposed amendment" is set for a mark up meeting this week. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:00 am
For more information about the proposed rule, or to view the proposed rule, click here. [read post]
They would also re-emphasize that Common Equity is the "predominant" component of Tier 1 Capital by (i) adding a minimum Common Equity to risk-weighted assets ratio, with the ratio itself to be determined based on the outcome of an impact study that the Committee is conducting, and (ii) requiring that goodwill, general intangibles and certain other items that currently must be deducted from Tier 1 Capital instead be deducted from Common Equity as a component of Tier 1 Capital. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:41 am
Reg. 8432, 8437 (FDA Mar. 4, 1996) (“FDA agrees that clearer labeling may in some instances help shield manufacturers from product liability. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 10:28 am by Jeff Kosseff
Exon’s bill proposed criminal penalties for the transmission of indecent materials to minors. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
Part 4, the final portion, of my paper on the existing Indian family exception to ICWA. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 1:50 pm by AdamSmith1776
Misbegotten "BHAGs" In a famous 1996 Harvard Business Review article (James C. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 6:34 am
Dec. 1, 2011) (same); In re Orthopedic Bone Screw Products Liability Litigation, 1996 WL 900353, at *2 (E.D. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 10:55 am by Howard Weiss
Obviously, we’re starting at the very, very beginning. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:00 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
  He concluded that, it was open to the council to re-assess Ms McDonald’s needs, to re-categorise them as a need to avoid leaving bed during the night and to conclude that this need could be met by providing her with the materials that would obviate the requirement to leave her bed. [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 1:45 pm by Giles Peaker
I don’t propose to go into detail on two of the issues (the status of a Housing Association as head lessee of a number of flats – was it a qualifying tenant, and whether the notice of claim was invalidated by not serving notice on the HA as a qualifying tenant), but there was one key issue which is likely to have broader importance. [read post]