Search for: "In Re Ransom"
Results 1 - 20
of 435
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2012, 12:45 pm
Supreme Court decided Ransom a year and a half ago, a number of courts have held that the clunker deduction is no longer valid. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 11:29 am
Bankruptcy Retroactivity The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Ransom v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 5:06 am
It's not ransom. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 10:40 am
MBNA America Bank (In re Ransom), ---- B.R. ---- (9th Cir. [read post]
12 May 2023, 6:31 am
Document What You’re Doing and Why You’re Doing It This reinforces one of the main principles in incident response. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 8:32 am
An academic publisher should widely disseminate the knowledge produced by scholars, not hold it for ransom. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 6:28 pm
via www.foxnews.com They're in trouble because the US doesn't pay ransoms. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 10:07 am
In its August decision in In re Ransom, the 9th Circuit has ruled that a debtor may not deduct on the means test, an automobile "ownership" cost, i.e., use the IRS ownership table, for an automobile he owns free and... [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
We’re living now in tragic times. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
We’re living now in tragic times. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 4:04 am
In re Signatory Vintage Scotch Whisky Company Limited, Serial No. 79261464 (August 3, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cynthia C. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 8:53 pm
When the Supreme Court ruled in Ransom v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 8:53 pm
When the Supreme Court ruled in Ransom v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 12:22 am
See In re Pak, 343 B.R. 239 (Bankr. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 10:58 pm
The court did not specify whether the Ransom decision, a chapter 13 case, applies to chapter 7 cases, yet the Court compared Ransom with two contrary chapter 7 Court of Appeal decisions, In re Ross-Tousey, and In re Tate, both of which permitted that ownership deduction for a free and clear vehicle on the chapter 7 Means Test. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 7:00 pm
Update: Steven Sotloff's parents are also now saying they were threatened with prosecution if they tried to raise the ransom money. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 10:17 am
“We’re following the directions of our insurance carrier,” Madison County Commissioner John Richwine told the Herald-Bulletin this morning. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 3:55 pm
The Ninth Circuit recently issued a very important decision in the case of In re Ransom, wherein it ruled that Debtors without vehicle debt can not deduct vehicle ownership expenses on Form B22 (the “means test”), a new form created under the new bankruptcy laws enacted in October, 2005. [read post]
23 May 2016, 11:27 am
" Actually, this is not a re-encryption, but rather a refusal to give up the full decryption in response to the payment of the [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 8:37 am
This situation would leave the insured in a precarious position, where it must decide whether to pay a ransom—and risk the ransom being uninsured—or not pay the ransom—and risk significant business interruption losses and other investigation and restoration costs while trying to restore data from backups. [read post]
