Search for: "In Re Roemer" Results 21 - 30 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2011, 12:34 pm by David Lat
They aren’t pretty words; in fact, they’re downright ugly. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 10:01 am by Michael Ginsborg
We're going to have a presence here for the next few years, making sure that our stories get told. [read post]
2 May 2019, 9:24 am by Daniel Shaviro
But it was more fundamentally about disagreeing that, in recent and present circumstances, any one country's offering foreign tax credits (while other countries were shifting their international tax systems in a more territorial direction) made sense either unilaterally, or strategically, or as conditional-Kantian cooperation (in John Roemer's sense). [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 1:17 pm by Kevin
Avlon says the California GOP is endorsing Elizabeth Emken, so maybe she's the best alternative if you're not a Feinsteinian. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 12:34 pm by Rick Hasen
We’re not influenced by the political class of consultants or guided by Washington lobbyists. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 11:45 pm by Lara
  After all, they’re charged with creating the laws, not understanding or abiding by them; right? [read post]
4 May 2015, 7:09 am by Ilya Shapiro
Roemer, . . . (1991) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:32 am
Roemer, 501 U.S. 380 (1991), where the Court held that section 2 of the Voting Rights Act covers judicial elections. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 7:22 pm by Bill Henderson
Stable, transparent, not very complicated, reasonably profitable, and often quite collegial. [read post]