Search for: "In Re Ronald C"
Results 1 - 20
of 339
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Ronald K.L. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Chicago 1927 p, 151. [11] E.g., Re Schweppes Ltd [1914] Ch 322. [12] Armen Alchian – Harold Demsetz, op.cit. p. 787. [13] See, e.g., Robert C. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 8:12 am
Together they describe the epistēmē (understood as "the strategic apparatus which permits of separating out from among all the statements which are possible those that will be acceptable" Foucault, Power/Knowledge (C. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:50 am
My response goes like this:1) We can group statutory texts into roughly three categories: (a) those whose meaning is obvious simply on the face of the text; (b) those whose meaning is not obvious on the face of the text but whose meaning can be authoritatively resolved using the standard tools of statutory interpretation; and (c) those whose meaning remains unclear or ambiguous even after the full use of all the standard tools of statutory interpretation.2) The critics of Brand X and… [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 12:56 am
The brief was written and filed by Gene C. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Session 3: Federalism John C. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Others have gone down this dubious path before, but these authors’ embrace of the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ opinion in Bendectin litigation reveals the insubstantiality and the invalidity of their method.[18] As Professor Ronald Allen put the matter: “Given the weight of evidence in favor of Bendectin’s safety, it seems peculiar to argue for mosaic evidence [WOE] from a case in which it would have plainly been misleading. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 2:31 pm
The OPM Debarment Process – Responding to an FEHBP Debarment or Suspension Action in 2024 (December 20, 2023): Most health care providers and suppliers are familiar with the fact that as a participating provider in the Medicare and / or Medicaid programs, certain criminal convictions, adverse licensure actions, and various types of prohibited conduct may subject the provider to exclusion from participation in Federal health care programs[1] by the… [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 6:30 am
Sunstein was, at that time, a progressive democrat who favored the egalitarian philosophy of John Rawls and defended Ronald Dworkin’s legal philosophy -theories that he would later set aside, perhaps too quickly. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 2:05 pm
Defendant proposed the appointment of Bruce Authement, Edward C. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am
Levin Ronald L. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Nonetheless, I agree with the assessment of Professor Ronald Mann, who, after listening to the oral argument, concluded that the Court would likely reject the challenge to Section 1052(c).Attorney Jonathan Taylor, who argued the case for the respondent, emphasized that Section 1052(c) is a speaker-based restriction on speech. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 8:55 am
We’re only 247 years into this grand experiment. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
Rounding out the state-specific discussions is a cogent offering in § 5 entitled, “Workplace Violence in New York Workers’ Compensation Claims,” by Ronald E. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
The Evolution of FTC Antitrust Enforcement – Highlights of Its Origins and Major Trends 1910-1914 – Creation and Launch The election of 1912, which led to the creation of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), occurred at the apex of the Progressive Era. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
(AP Photo/Eric Gay)Follow @dorfonlaw Michael C. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am
They’re participating, they’re parenting but they’re not using the regulatory construction that we all understand. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 3:52 pm
2019-02, pp 1-35 Brand, Ronald A. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
If you’re having trouble understanding the difference, Josh Chafetz has the best articulation of the “strong” version of the MQD: “If a majority of justices determine that eating an ice cream cone is a major question, then it is not enough that Congress has empowered the agency to ‘eat any dessert it chooses. [read post]
