Search for: "In Re Rowell"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2012, 9:00 pm
Rowell (2009). [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:59 am
Rowell v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 9:00 pm
Rowell (2009). [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a recent Center for American Progress report, Bobby Kogan, senior director of federal budget policy, argued that tax cuts under Presidents George W. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 9:03 pm
” WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a report issued by the U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:39 am
ANOTHER UPDATE: Reader David Rowell thinks “Chess Club Wedgies” is a good name for a band. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 2:05 pm
The study looked at past cases of plagiarism that were concluded and re-evaluated them using the tariff. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 2:05 pm
The study looked at past cases of plagiarism that were concluded and re-evaluated them using the tariff. [read post]
5 May 2022, 4:11 am
” As a panel, we’re bound to follow both Supreme Court and circuit precedent—whether we like it or not. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 6:14 am
See, e.g., In re Dinnan, 661 F.2d 426, 431–32 (5th Cir. 1981); D’Aurizio v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 12:59 pm
But a modest suggestion for next time: If you're going to hand out texts in the program book (here, translations for everything not sung in English), then leave up the lights so the audience can actually read them during the performance. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 6:18 pm
Keynote 4: “Disruptive Scholarship: An Idea Whose Time Has Come (Re)Use, (Re)Mix, (Re)New” Eccentric is perhaps the only word to desc [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:30 am
Welcome Presenter: Gill Rowell Position and Organization: Academic Advisor PlagiarismAdvice.org The welcome on the second day was very short and only covered two things. [read post]
4 May 2017, 4:00 am
No person shall (a) make a false or misleading statement tending to discredit the business, wares or services of a competitor; The seminal C&D case from the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”), S & S Industries Inc. v Rowell[2], established the test for section 7(a) as follows: A false or misleading statement; Tending to discredit the business, wares or services of a competitor; and Resulting damage Significantly, this SCC decision held that no malice was required for… [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
Andy Coulson will face a re-trial in June over the acquisition of royal directories while he was in charge at the News of the World. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
If you’re having trouble understanding the difference, Josh Chafetz has the best articulation of the “strong” version of the MQD: “If a majority of justices determine that eating an ice cream cone is a major question, then it is not enough that Congress has empowered the agency to ‘eat any dessert it chooses. [read post]
