Search for: "In Re Royal Properties Inc" Results 41 - 60 of 97
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
As my colleague Perell J. put it in High Parklane Consulting Inc. v Royal Group Technologies Ltd., [2007] OJ No 107 (SCJ), at para 36, “[i]t is trite to say that making a living is a stressful activity and that much of life can be nasty and brutish. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Deloitte Restructuring Inc., 2020 QCCA 438, 2021 SCC 53 (39186) This appeal raises an issue relating to compensation, or set off in a common law setting, between two debts in the context of proceedings under the CCAA. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 2:02 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This appeal will consider whether CITCO BVI and TCCL breached any duties owed to Cibin in issuing a power of attorney for the sale of property. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:37 am by Rebecca Tushnet
You’re paying for what you hope is a greater chance of a better outcome. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Lots of people have campaigned against it – smart people w… 2018-09-11 RT @Soc_of_Authors: Here are the key arguments we’re hearing against the directive, and why we think they’re misleading: 2018-09-11 Europe’s chance to write the music for a generation https://t.co/JRtHaykSBp 2018-09-11 The end of Kodi add-ons? [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 6:00 am
"If you don't take the pittance they offer, they're going to put on the boxing gloves and they're going to batter injured victims," plaintiffs attorney J. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 6:00 am
"If you don't take the pittance they offer, they're going to put on the boxing gloves and they're going to batter injured victims," plaintiffs attorney J. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 1:00 pm
"If you don't take the pittance they offer, they're going to put on the boxing gloves and they're going to batter injured victims," plaintiffs attorney J. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
For example, the PTO denied registration under Section 1052(c) to ROYAL KATE as applied to watches, cufflinks, jewelry, and other luxury products based solely on the determination that “ROYAL KATE identifies Kate Middleton whose identity is renowned. [read post]
29 May 2007, 2:22 am
ALM Privacy Policy / Contact Us © 2007 ALM Properties, Inc. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
In re Sharp 15-646Issue: (1) Whether Johnson v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am by Barry Sookman
The re-hearing took place on December 15, 2014 (oral argument available here) and the decision of the full court is still outstanding. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am by centerforartlaw
In March 2002, the Benin Royal Palace and the Federal Ministry of Information and Culture from Nigeria formally requested that “all the cultural property belonging to the Oba of Benin illegally taken away by the British in 1897 should be returned to the rightful owner, the Oba of Benin. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 7:02 am by Eric Goldman
 We’re in the midst of a battle royale over the legally permitted verisimilitude of commercial videogames and immersive environments like virtual worlds and the metaverse. [read post]