Search for: "In Re Rule 3.850 of Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2012, 10:39 am by David M. Trontz
Motions to vacate for ineffective of counsel can also be filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 2:05 pm by Leslie Sammis
Motion for Post-Conviction Relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 which must normally be filed within two years of the sentencing or the conviction being affirmed on appeal whichever occurred later. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Alexander, No. 06-1867 A sentence for sexual abuse of a minor is vacated and remanded where the district court plainly erred in failing to provide notice of an upward variance as required by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(h). [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 5:20 am
Case 6:07-cv-01798-ACC-KRS Document 8 Filed 11/14/2007 Page 1 of 9 2 Plaintiff filed a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 raising a variety of claims. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
Contemporary Eighth Amendment jurisprudence upholds the authority of the courts to review a state legislature's decision generally, and specifically to review a legislature's enactments regarding criminal punishment. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
Schwab filed a timely notice of appeal of the circuit court's Order on June 25, 2008.1 STANDARD OF REVIEW Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(d) provides that adefendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on postconviction 1 Exhibits listed in the brief are the exhibits submitted with the Motion to Vacate filed with the lower court on June20, 2008. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
He then filed a motion forpostconviction relief, followed by an amended Rule 3.850 motion. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 3:37 pm by Law Lady
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 2nd District.Criminal law -- Post conviction relief -- Timeliness of motion -- Two-year window for filing rule 3.850 commenced on date judgment and sentence became final after appellate court remanded case for resentencing -- Remand for further proceedings? [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:44 pm by cdw
LEXIS 479 (Ga. 6/13/2011) “[T]he trial court erred regarding the burden of proof to be applied to Stripling’s claim of mental retardation, that the trial court did not err by ruling that standard criminal procedural rules would apply to Stripling’s retrial on the issue of mental retardation, and that the trial court erred by ruling that it lacked the authority to consider any plea bargain that the parties might be willing to enter… [read post]