Search for: "In Re Russell A. Lane, Petitioner"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2014, 11:53 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the petitioner in this case. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 2:13 pm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the petitioner in this case. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 10:26 am
Schmitz told another program employee that she planned to “get [Lane] back” for terminating her and that, if he requested money from the state legislature, she would tell him “you’re fired. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:58 am
” [Disclosure: Kevin Russell of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel to the petitioner in Heien at the cert. stage through the Stanford Law School Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, but he is not participating in the case at the merits stage.] [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:20 am
[Disclosure: The law firm of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel to the petitioner in Loughrin and Lane and on an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Halliburton. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 3:15 am
Lane, J.) [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 1:26 pm
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel to the petitioner in Lane v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:08 am
Franks, the Court unanimously re-affirmed its holding from Garcetti v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Lane (1989) and Griffith v. [read post]
