Search for: "In Re STARRETT " Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2007, 10:32 am
  No, wait, they're probably enjoying watching his criminal prosecution too much to worry about that. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 6:11 am
Answer: You need to provide your attorney with more information, namely whether you're behind on your mortgage payments and the amount of equity in your home. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 3:41 pm by Adrian Lurssen
We're pleased to announce our new iPhone application, which allows lawyers and legal professionals to reach mobile users with the content they upload on JD Supra. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 1:42 am
You're going to stand on protocol when lives and property are on the line? [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 5:14 pm by bklemm@foley.com
” The last case cited (In re Starrett) is interesting not just because of its specific subject matter, but also because it does not pertain to life sciences technology (although according to the Federal Circuit decision it did claim to pertain to “a gadget-free extension of human senses”). [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:57 pm by Joey Fishkin
On the surface, Inclusive Communities Project, which was argued today at the Supreme Court, is a statutory interpretation case. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Medical Device: MEDICAL DEVICE SUPPLIER ISN'T 'HEALTH CARE PROVIDER', Orthopedic Res. v. [read post]