Search for: "In Re Sassower" Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Claimant's allegation of impropriety amounts to nothing more than an allegation of corruption, which is insufficient to overcome judicial immunity (Rosenstein v State of New York, 37 AD3d 208, 208-209 [1st Dept 2007]; Tarter v State of New York, 68 NY2d 511, 518 [1986]; Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586), and no exception to application of the doctrine (Alvarez v Snyder, 264 AD2d 27, 34 [1st Dept 2000]; see Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586-587) is present here. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Claimant's allegation of impropriety amounts to nothing more than an allegation of corruption, which is insufficient to overcome judicial immunity (Rosenstein v State of New York, 37 AD3d 208, 208-209 [1st Dept 2007]; Tarter v State of New York, 68 NY2d 511, 518 [1986]; Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586), and no exception to application of the doctrine (Alvarez v Snyder, 264 AD2d 27, 34 [1st Dept 2000]; see Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586-587) is present here. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 5:33 am
., 938 F.Supp. 628 (S.D.Cal.1996) (holding that § 1927 is applicable to pro se plaintiffs); contra Sassower v. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 10:33 am
“With Kirkland, you’re not just hiring a law firm, you’re choosing a team. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
The Sassower case, about which I wrote here and here, is a textbook illustration of the litigation woes that can follow when the buy-sell fails to articulate relevant valuation parameters. [read post]