Search for: "In Re Schmelzer"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2007, 1:37 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil Practice
Culpability of Exercise Ball's Chinese Maker Cannot Be Considered for Non-Economic Loss Apportionment
Schmelzer v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 4:47 am
There are a whole host of other reasons why an employer trims the work force, and I can almost guarantee that while workers' compensation premiums may be a part of the equation, the reality is that work comp premium (or self insured retention) is for most employers (unless you're a roofing company or other high risk employer) only about 1% of the cost of labor. [read post]
